![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
Notice I put the work CARD in quotation marks, it is not my intent to revisit the ongoing debate of what constitutes a card. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
1878---forbes trade card. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
1882 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
Depends whether you consider Abner Doubleday part of baseball or not. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Abner Doubleday is part of the myth, but he is not a part of the actual game. He's sort of a folk hero, and that's about it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joseph
First I cut the page from 1864's "The American Boy's Book of Sports and Games" that contains the first color illustration of a baseball game. Then I submit the page to a company that will grade and slab it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
Doubleday is definitely part of the myth of the game, but his CDV's carry a premium because of it and are collected by baseball collectors so I would consider it a "baseball card". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken W.
Al beat me to it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brad
This would be my oldest "card"! |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
Ken, do you and I have the same collection? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken W.
Or, perhaps we are the same person, living and collecting in alternate universes? Hopefully, mine is the one where Doubleday did, indeed, invent baseball - so my card will carry a premium! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bruce Dorskind
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark
1863 cricket card. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh Adams
Bruce, |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Glenn
1884 Lawson Game |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Prizner
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
Mark: |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
The Harry Wright from the Jordan & Co. set is unique, and was one of the four that was used for admission to the cricket match. While the George Wright is from the same photo shoot, it does not have the reverse advertising. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark
Thanks Phil. Yes, when I bought the Jordan & Co. G. Wright, the auction house also had a Jordan & Co. Harry and Sam Wright (their father). JC has an 1865 Mathew Brady CDV with the same image of Harry and Sam. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Yes, I did own that G.Wright CdV at one time. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jimmy Leiderman
My ex-grand match CDV before encapsulation. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Nice one Jimmy. That appears to be one of the two poses of Crossley. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd "The Vintage Baseball Card Forum" contest | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 199 | 02-02-2007 02:55 PM |
"O/T" Funny T-206 eBay Auction - "One Owner" Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-11-2006 09:22 AM |
Finally a real Wagner on eBay, but "The oldest card made"!? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 10-12-2006 07:05 AM |
"Baseball Card Magazine" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-29-2005 07:48 AM |
Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |