![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rob
i only own one T206 ... its a Manning NY AL in a batting pose with a 150 series sweet caporal back. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Murray
I've always referred to a card appearing in both the 150 and 350 series as a "code 2" card. Cards appearing only in the 150 series as "code 1" cards and cards appearing only in the 350 series as "code 3". I'm not real clear on the dates but think that the 150 series is 1909 and the 350 series 1910. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pennsylvania Ted
There are theoretically 144 cards in the T206 set that were issued 1st with the 150 Series in 1909, and |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Murray
Am I correct that there are cards in the 350 series and 460 series that would be "code 4" cards and cards only in the 460 series that would be "code 5" cards? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
I could be wrong. My thinking was that 150 series were issued in the spring and summer of 1909 and on into the first part of 1910. 350 series were issued the later part of 1910 and then 460 series were issued a very short time in 1911. Ted or Scot would probably know for sure. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
Scot Reader's Inside T206 (available at the link below) provides all the insight necessary to become relatively advanced in the ways and means of T206. It improves upon the previous source material, including Lipset's and Heitman's, which are also both excellent. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pennsylvania Ted
Your "codifying" of the different T206 Series is interesting....but, the following breakdown is more accurate |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Murray
Putting the Southerns in with a separate code is helpful but old habits die hard. I guess I'll call the Southerns a "code 6" though in reality they are a "code 3". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scot Reader
If I can further muddy the waters, I would bifurcate the southern leaguers and the 350/460 subjects into two distinct series each (due to theoretical differences in back availability indicated in the parentheticals). |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Murray
I'll just stick to my zeenuts. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
It's "too" |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott
Simple question. Not sure if this is the right place to ask. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pennsylvania Ted
The following backs have been confirmed..... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott
Your efforts are not only fun for you, but appreciated by many. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
hockey rookie cards question | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 10-21-2007 05:39 AM |
Question on authenticity of T206 Mathewson which leads to a rookie grading dilemma... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-10-2007 07:37 AM |
One more rookie question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-03-2005 05:14 PM |
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-10-2004 08:00 PM |
Ryan rookie question. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-16-2003 12:37 PM |