![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Elkins
The T206 Piedmont 150 Plank that was cut from the same sheet as the now PSA 8 Piedmont 150 Wagner! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Aaron
Looks like a possibility. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MikeU
I would bet the President of REA could answer all these questions. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
If I were the one cutting up that sheet, I sure would have been a lot more careful with the Plank. For this reason alone, I doubt it came from the same hypothesized sheet as the Wagner may have. If that Wagner card was in fact cut from a sheet in 1981 or even the '70's for the purpose of having the individual cards, they surely would have been very careful in the cutting process around the other most important cards. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
If cut in 1909 at a factory or home by a factory worker for themselves or their kids, they probably would have been more careless than a dealer who bought a sheet in the late '70's or early '80s. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Elkins
From my understanding, the person who cut the cards originally wasn't that careful. This resulted in the Wagner being oversized, as he must have known that was a good card to have and was more careful with it. I agree with you however, that it seems, at least with our knowledge of the Plank, that one would have been extremely careful cutting the Plank from the sheet. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Eric B
If the Wagner was next to the Plank he would have cut as much border around the Wagner as possible.....up to the color part of the surrounding cards. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Randy Trierweiler
After visiting the link that Scott shows in the first post, my McAfee advisor went crazy. I don't know how many of you have McAfee for virus protection, but here is what it warned: Just an FYI |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Elkins
This is the first I heard of it. However, I did pay up the Premium Membership for one and a half years - there should be no spam or problems on the site. I will have to inquire other members if this has happened with them as well, as I have not heard of it until now. I will definitely check it out, as it should not be happening. Thanks again, Scott |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Sean
No problems with me Scott. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Randy Trierweiler
Scott, I didn't realize you were the owner of that site. I just thought you had a post there after following your link. Maybe you can contact McAfee.com and they can give you some information you need. Randy |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter chao
Guys, |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
You won't believe what I just found!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-24-2008 04:40 PM |
Found This A Little Interesting... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-17-2007 05:32 PM |
Partner Found | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 10-26-2007 10:01 AM |
Please help, FOUND. What is it?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-04-2007 01:14 PM |
I found him! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-04-2002 09:21 PM |