![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Ok, two times over the past few days I've noticed shill bidding on ebay auctions and have reported it to ebay. I'll provide the two examples and tell me what you think ebay did in response: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Im guessing ebay couldnt or wouldnt put two and two together and let the auctions proceed. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason
"PSA Registry what?...." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John S
I have complained about shill bidding a number of times. My question regarding ebay is why do they still allow sellers to keep bidders' identities private? In those cases potential buyers can only assume that shill bidding might be occuring. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
On the first situation Ebay claimed no evidence of shilling. As for the second one, despite promising to get back to me in a proscribed period of time, ebay ignored me and the auction ends tonight. Here's a question: when I get the card that I was shilled for (for $200 bucks) do I leave a negative feedback? (I've already received positive from the seller) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe D.
You won the auction? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
I won the auction with a snipe bid. The underbidder (shill) put in a bid that was designed to set up an artificial reserve. When I bid, the price for the auction was $200 less than what I ended up paying for the card. I was unaware at the time the auction was going on that the underbidder was a shill (I don't normally check the bona fides of each bidder on an auction); however, after the auction was over I was surprised at the final price and grew suspicious. Obviously I put in too high of a snipe (arguably) but that shouldn't cause me to be stuck with a final sales price influenced solely by a single shill bidder. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve f
Ebay frequently ignores these reports, rarely do they actually boot the auction any more -there's just too much riffraff for the security division to investigate. It is up to us buyers to set the standards. I certainly wouldn't leave a positive. The seller knows the rule, he took a risk and broke it. And without correction he's likely to do it again in the next auction (Heck, it's profitable). He stupidly left a positive and left himself open. This is a rare opportunity without fear of retribution. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
I'd be pissed too. Some people seem to think that if a buyer wins it for his bid or less, that he should be happy with it. But that's forgetting the fact that the buyer may have won the auction for even less if not for the shill bidder. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shill bidding | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-05-2006 03:38 PM |
Shill Bidding? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-11-2006 07:25 AM |
shill bidding on this? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-15-2006 12:33 PM |
Ebay announces new Shill Bidding policy...Thought? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-20-2005 05:26 PM |
Shill Bidding? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-02-2003 11:04 PM |