![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe
What do you think is the most undervalued pre war set and or specific card. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Darren J. Duet
T202 for undervalued set, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
Most undervalued card = any Hornsby. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Neal
My vote is both the 1911 T201 Mecca Folder set and the 1910-12 Sweet Caporal P2 pin set! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Manos
You never see them, even on ebay. They have all the stars of the day and all the Black Sox. Furthermore, it is a large set of 120 cards. The book has Hofer's at $150 and commons at $60. I have never seen one on ebay nor offered on the board except for myself(I have 3 Hofer's) and Dan Mckee which has a few Hofer's priced at $1000. They are impossible. You never here about this set and the guide's are wrong on the pricing due to the fact they have no compariable's for price. The price on these in the guide's has been the same for 10 years. Lastly, Bob Lemke just did a full page article on these in the latest SCD (weekly publication). I bet a Joe jackson in this set would bring the house down as the M101-4's and 5's due very well. Very unique set in a era of not many card issue's. That's my Most Undervalued Set. Would love to here peoples comment on this post. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
Gil, you might slip Heilmann into #3 on your list. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
Anson: HH may deserve the no. 1 slot. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Darren J. Duet
Heilmann, Hornsby, and Sisler. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
Seems to me that Riggs Stephenson and his cards are underappreciated, as well. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
I almost never see them ANYUWHERE. They are excellent likenesses of the players, and they are funny. Something we undervalue in baseball cards, BTW. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
That is true Julie! I only have one - and wish I could find one of those "How will you have it" cards; because of the historical commentary. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: tbob
T212-2 Series of 150, hands down. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anson
Again, biased as I am, I still think E101s are a bargain compared to their E102 siblings. If you check pop reports (not reliable), there are more examples, if not twice as many, of E102 HOFers than E101s. Yet, they still seem to sell at significantly higher prices. Yeah, the backs are pretty uninteresting with both but who gets excited over American Caramel or Dockman backs anyway? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1914 Cracker Jacks Undervalued? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-03-2008 05:28 PM |
1920's Exhibits - undervalued or not | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-05-2007 05:21 PM |
Is '49 Leaf Robinson Undervalued? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-20-2007 02:28 PM |
High grade cards are undervalued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 66 | 08-26-2005 03:37 PM |
undervalued cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 06-13-2005 12:01 AM |