![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Although some may think that the Red Stocking Cigar schedule (No! It's not a card) is the world's greatest schedule, I would like to submit that I believe that the following 1885 Chicago schedule surpasses it.I thought that you guys would get a kick out of seeing the piece. The back shows the officers and players as well as the schedule of home games for the 1885 season. The front, like a Peck & Snyder trade card, has a photo of the 1885 team. This is not just an ordinary photo, however. This is the photo from which the image of Cap Anson for the Old Judge Anson in Uniform card, the most famous and valuable 19th century card, came. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gary B.
that was created from this image for a side by side comparison? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: The Other One
.... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andy Baran
Jay, |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Maybe they got the facial expression from this photo, but unless Im looking at the wrong player in the team photo, Anson's arms are folded differently in each picture - in one the left arm is on top, and in one the right arm is on top. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Actually, looking a bit closer, it appears that they put Ansons head on the body of the player immediately below him in the front row. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Josh---You are exactly correct. Anson is Uniform is actually a composite of Anson's head on another body. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: hankron
Jay, very neat item. Beats that Edgar Martinez pocket sked on my refrigerator. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andy Baran
So, what are the measurements? Just curious. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
famous - yes.....most famous ?? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: The Other One
I was watching as the picture was posting--and at first, I thought you were comparing it to the Cincinnati Red Stockings because of the size, but then I saw it was the Red Stocking Cigar--the one Lipset owns--because it's a schedule. Jeez, who cares what you call it? It's great in a different way. You'd certainly be the first to admit (with that gorgeous cabinet of Anson you have)that it's not the greatest PICTURE of Anson (as the Cin. R.S. Cigar probably is of Radbourne). It's greatness lies in that it IS Anson as captain of the Chicagos, and is most of the great and mysteriously rare card in the N172 set--I can't find Kelly. Where is he? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason Smith
So, that superimposing thing they did, did they do that with Photoshop or what? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe_G.
I don't know how you do it Jay, so many beautiful items. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: FatBoy
I'm sitting here in my office this morning having trouble drinking my coffee because my bottom jaw is hanging so low. Keith |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Andy---Sorry, the schedule measures 41/2"x31/2" |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: hankron
Not for this one, but for some old composite baseball photos, the photographer would cut out the pieces and pin them in desired design against a background. Like pinning notes to a corkboard. In some old sports photos you can see the pins in the image. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
David is exactly right. On Old Judge cards you can often see the pins holding on the Old Judge ad and/or the player's name, position and team at the bottom of the card. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh Evans
First, I give it a 10. Amazing. In my opinion its "essentially" (regardless of size) a CdV, Carte-de-Visite (in French "calling card"). The schedule is technically advertising. Hence it's a card (don't argue, makes the piece more important). It's a card. And a schedule. And a photo. And whatever else you want to call it (awesome?). But who cares. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Josh--I yield to your expertise---a card it shall be. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
It wasn't the schedule I was talking about.. which is awesome. It was the card (Anson in uniform) that Jay had said was the most expensive 19th century card. It might be but I would think that the Just So Cy Young or possibly the Kelly Four Base Hits would be right up there with it. I don't believe there has been an actual sale of <$100k 19th century card ( at least not publicly) but I would think any of the 3 I mentioned could potentially get there. So to correct myself I really should say "maybe" to the statement about the Anson....regardless all are swell cards......AND no problem in EVER questioning me. I have been known to recant a statement a few times......I only "used" to be perfect |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
New Shimmer is both! |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: The other One (Julie)
Cincinnati Red Stockings Peck and Snyder, the large one with the characature of the owner (?) on the back? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
Just becuase you can scrub your elbows with this thing doesn't make it a loofa. This whole, is it a card or not, is totally retarded. It's a schedule for gods sake!!! Nothing more, nothing less. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: The Other One (Julie)
I'd call it a schedule-card. Covers both appearance and function. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Alternate Opinion
Why can't it be a "card-schedule"? Does it have to be a "schedule-card"? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
If a "cricket ticket" is not a card ... then I have to be consistent and say that this is not a card... |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: The Other One (Julie)
whether something is a card or not? I mean, we argue for HOURS about whether thee or four things are cards, schedules or part of an album. Some of these things have numerical designations--but the E.R. Williams game cards do not. So: why is it important whether things are cards or Something else? The only thing I can figure out is that the card designation will somehow positively affect their value. This, in spite of the fact that people hasten to say "It's a schedule--but worth every penny anyone could possibly charge for it." |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Maybe because this forum is for vintage baseball CARDS ??? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: The Other One (Julie)
"The New York Times," for all I care... |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andy Baran
Just for Fun.......How is this schedule any less of a card than the Betz Cabinet or 1882 Chicago Cabinet that you own? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh Evans
Now I'm really gonna make trouble |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Josh--I don't think so. This was purchased from Barry Sloate almost ten years ago. I have been told by the number one expert in the hobby on that collection that pieces from it have vestages of a NY library stamp on the back, and have written on them the bin number that the object was stored in. This schedule has no such markings; the back is clean. It is not a unique item. I have seen a damaged version of this schedule and there may be other copies. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
World's Largest to Scale bat | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 02-20-2009 07:03 PM |
The World's Stupidist Stat | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 07-21-2007 09:21 AM |
1925-26 Holland World's champions!!!! | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-17-2006 11:02 PM |
Hi. What is the world's most valuable baseball card ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-15-2006 09:56 AM |
Tristar Hidden Treasures World's Greatest Card Chase | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-08-2006 04:39 PM |