![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John Bomgardner
Hi, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mrc32
Send it in to be graded and see...or post a pic here and we'll try and help. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John Bomgardner
It is graded by PSA already and it is a 5. Does PSA miss counterfeits like this one. It is recently graded. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John Bomgardner
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John Bomgardner
It is a very nice card for the grade and has no wrinkles or creases at all. This is my second Mantle 1951 and it is nice. God I hope PSA would not grade a counterfeit. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jon
What makes you think the card is fake? This must be some discerning fact that has bothered you. Othwerise, what made you questions the card's authenticity? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
It seems like a nice card. I don't know. Has PSA gotten more strict on their grading standards lately? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marc S.
why do you think the card is fake? Though every grading company makes mistakes -- it is rare that mistakes are made on cards of such importance. You must have some reason to think it is fake, don't you? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Actually it is the "same" Mantle card but it is not really. If you would look closely you would see the different PSA numbers. I own both and will be posting one on ebay tonight. I like both of them. I will not reholder the card because I am concerned about ripping the card out of the holder and doing damage. Also, the postal service is not exactly the greatest. They see insurance on the package and they say "not my problem if its broken or ruined" I am sorry if I ask the same thing about two of the "same" card. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marc S.
<<Actually it is the "same" Mantle card but it is not really. If you would look closely you would see the different PSA numbers. I own both and will be posting one on ebay tonight. I like both of them. I will not reholder the card because I am concerned about ripping the card out of the holder and doing damage. Also, the postal service is not exactly the greatest. They see insurance on the package and they say "not my problem if its broken or ruined" I am sorry if I ask the same thing about two of the "same" card.>> |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
I am concerned and paranoid like everyone else. and when you buy the card online and do not see it first you tend to have buyers regret. I trust psa and I have heard stories about things and problems. If I seem to be a bit paranoid then shoot me. I am sure you have had buyers regret. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hankron
Having read your posts, I'm not sure if you're concerned about the card's authenticity as much as it's grade (WIWAG?). |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hankron
So as not to come across as gloom and doom, the vast majorities of counterfeits are easily identifiable to someone familiar with the issues, especially if the collector has some sample cards for comparison. There are often these theories of some super breed of counterfiets that even experts can't identify-- which is crap. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MW
John, |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for 1948 Bowman Musial, 1951 Bowman Mays and 1954 Topps Aaron | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-17-2009 10:59 AM |
1951 Bowman Football | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 24 | 07-10-2008 08:36 AM |
1951 Bowman Ted Williams QUESTION | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 10-01-2007 10:55 PM |
1951 Bowman Mickey Mantle | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 05-08-2005 12:44 PM |
1951 Bowman question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-10-2003 12:20 PM |