![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie
Hi Everyone: I use a Canon scanner and it's fine to scan a card that hasn't been graded but for some reason the plastic graded case makes the scan appear blurry...I have some cards on now under T206nnof and you can see what i mean...If anyone can recommend a nice scanner...even the combo ones with scanner, printer, fax and copyier are fine...Thanks a lot. Charlie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hankron
I use a Kodak 9x4900 digital camera, so I don't have that type of problem. Though they can create great images of smaller, flat items, I have no interest in going back to a scanner. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bill Cornell
Charlie- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Elliot
I have a Lexmark, and exactly the same problem. I think what causes the slightly blurry image is the fact that the a card in the slab is not right on the scanner bed and is thus slightly out of focus. I'd love to hear a solution. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jeff s
I have a Canon, too, and have the same problem with slabbed cards. (Though those of you who know what most of my cards look like know that I can't have that much of a problem with slabbed cards.) This solution won't work for folks who buy slabbed cards, only those who buy them raw and then slab them. I make sure to have a good scan of a card before sending it out for grading (a good idea anyway). Then, if I decide to list the card for sale, I can provide both a good scan of the card, and a not-so-good scan of the slab, with card inside. (except for when I forget. but in theory, this works.) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I use a Microtek Scanmaker 3600 scanner...approx. $40.00.... and agree with Jeff about slabs in that they hinder scans .....and love type collecting.... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
works perfecto and is smaller and faster than Bills and the program is easier to use but the result is the same and ut costs $270.00 BIN on e-bay. I had the one Bill uses and lsot it after a football playoff game last year? If I had to choose,I would buy the newer smaller version for time saving! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
I have a HP ScanJet 3300C that I paid $50 for and it works great on everything I have scanned, highly recommended here. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: TBob
I paid all of $50 for it way back when. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie
Thanks for all the feedback...I'm going to pick up one of the HP all in one deals. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
your scanner lacks detail production and probably hinders some prices realized for you. there is no comparison to the HP scanners and an Acer is not a good recommendation. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which scanner is the best for scanning cards?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 01-05-2009 05:10 AM |
Quality Scanner for graded cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 08-03-2008 06:37 PM |
Shopping For New Scanner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 07-24-2007 05:47 PM |
I need a better scanner - suggestions? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-03-2007 04:22 PM |
don't have a scanner? use this w. your digital camera for your cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-14-2007 10:46 PM |