Show...me...your print variations!

[ALR-bishop]

That Hudson/Sandlock bottom connection was discussed in and SCD article. Can not recall if by Lemke or George Vrechek

[savedfrommyspokes]

Another faded 71:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/18569743668...8AAOSw9oJjmQhE

[Sliphorn]

Originally Posted by Tedwilliams1918

Really helps explain hudson/sandlock

Was Sandlock double-printed? The card on the right in your scan shows some black all the way down the left margin but Hudson has blue skies on the right side of his. Interesting.

[Tedwilliams1918]

Here’s a creepy one guys, 1958 dick groat wearing lipstick💄……I think it’s just the difference in brand new ink but really looks like he’s wearing lipstick

[ALR-bishop]

That is a tad creepy

[frankhardy]

Some today would say that is perfectly normal. It will ALWAYS be creepy!

[Tedwilliams1918]

I got some 1958s in the mail today that I am obsessed with, big thanks to cliff bowman on giving them to me….what a great guy I wanna return the favor….. do you like ted Williams or hank Aaron better?

[frankhardy]

Is Richard Dingman on Net54? Is he part of this thread?

I have his website saved and have been looking at his variations list. I would like to get in touch with him.

[butchie_t]

Originally Posted by frankhardy

Is Richard Dingman on Net54? Is he part of this thread?

I have his website saved and have been looking at his variations list. I would like to get in touch with him.

The email address on his site works. He is a member here but has not posted much lately. I have been in contact with him recently via the brightair address.

Richard has many cards for sale on ebay as well.

Cheers,

Butch

[butchie_t]

Originally Posted by Tedwilliams1918

Here’s a creepy one guys, 1958 dick groat wearing lipstick💄……I think it’s just the difference in brand new ink but really looks like he’s wearing lipstick

I posted these previously in this thread. Not as creepy though.

https://www.net54baseball.com/showpo...postcount=2222

[Tedwilliams1918]

You can contact him on Facebook

[Elberson]

Ok……here’s another 1967 Topps variation for you…..Jim king 509……it can be found with multiple color shifts in his name…..white (normal? Lol), rainbow, green, blue, yellow)….I have the rainbow….pictures are from eBay so good luck hunting them

[Elberson]

More pictures…..white name, yellow and green

[Elberson]

Ok just noticed that my blue was a tri color rainbow 🌈. Here’s a close up of the M in Jim

[Tedwilliams1918]

Mr king is very nice, but every 50s/60s topps cards should have similar print shifts

[ALR-bishop]

Shouldn't....but often do

[Elberson]

And my other 2 extras…….sooooooo pretty……almost Xmas like

[Tedwilliams1918]

One of my Facebook friends is selling his sand patch error of anyone is interested

[Tedwilliams1918]

Paid a ton way more than a Regular 1958 but I won another! With missing text

[swarmee]

1972 Topps #92 AL ERA Leaders with Palmer, Blue, and Wood.

Variation 1: Blue line through yellow border next to Jim Palmer.


Variation 2: Blue line extends into the yellow above Palmer's name.

[ALR-bishop]

Good one John

[swarmee]

Originally Posted by Elberson

Ok……here’s another 1967 Topps variation for you…..Jim king 509……it can be found with multiple color shifts in his name…..white (normal? Lol), rainbow, green, blue, yellow)….I have the rainbow….pictures are from eBay so good luck hunting them

These don't really count. They're just non-repeating bad registration from poor alignment of the sheets being fed through the press during the different colors.

[Elberson]

Anybody see this over inked 1967 528 petrocelli before? I couldn’t find another one

[Tedwilliams1918]

Rico is too much water in the ink!….nice card I believe he does a podcast now

[jbaskin]

I think I have one. Thus type of variation runs through a few of that series, especially Ribant, that I recall.

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by jbaskin

I think I have one. Thus type of variation runs through a few of that series, especially Ribant, that I recall.

I wonder if it has something to do with being on the right side of the printing sheet, Ribant is on the right edge of the sheet and I strongly suspect that Petrocelli is too.

[ejstel]

Check closely the right hash of the card on the left, I thought it was a pen mark but it continues 'under' the white border.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

[swarmee]

Recurring; here's a copy on COMC right now:

1970 Topps - [Base] #617 - Jim French
Courtesy of COMC.com

Nice find.

[Elberson]

Ok….we all know the 1967 Topps highs are really tuff but found another winner…….595 Rojas.

Here are two pictures. First one normal and second one print off set and blotched back in two different spots (large blotch has the snake skin or dots….which is in a few of the high numbers)

[Tedwilliams1918]

Similar 1967 I found last year

[strike-in]

wrong location for post

[strike-in]

wrong posting location

[Tedwilliams1918]

Lots of faint missing black, it’s not enough for me to care or count it as special, is it in the same spot on the sheet as mantle & company?

[Tedwilliams1918]

Cliff I added those wonderful cards you gave me
https://wordpress.com/post/vintageba...ibextid=Zxz2cZ

[butchie_t]

I added the three Bob's today to my 72 set. I am getting to the point where I will need two binders for my 72 set. With all the variations and variations of variations, I am thinking this set will never be considered done as it pertains to a master set. I'm good......

Cheers

B.T.

[ALR-bishop]

Tim McCarver, who joined the Cardinals in the same time frame as Gibson but was a little behind him in starting, told a story about going to the mound in 1963 after Gibson had walked a couple of batters and seemed agitated to "calm him down". Before he could say anything Gibson told him, "McCarver, get your ass back behind the plate. The only thing you know about good pitching is that you can't hit it"

[butchie_t]

Bob Gibson was a seriously imposing figure when he took the mound. I loved watching him in 68 World Series. When the mounds were higher than they are now, he just looked un-hitable to this 8 year old kid at the time.

[Tedwilliams1918]

It’s not as drastic as mantle or enos…..but it is very spotty everywhere it’s definitely not wear

[ALR-bishop]

Originally Posted by Tedwilliams1918

Cliff I added those wonderful cards you gave me
https://wordpress.com/post/vintageba...ibextid=Zxz2cZ

Cliff is one of the hobby good guys

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by Tedwilliams1918

Lots of faint missing black, it’s not enough for me to care or count it as special, is it in the same spot on the sheet as mantle & company?

I'm guessing the 1958 Topps #375 Pee Wee Reese you are referring to is similar to this one. It's not related to all of the others which are numbered between 130-198, Reese is from a later series sheet being numbered 375.

[Tedwilliams1918]

How can 1962 willow mays have two different cut lines on the bottom??….cliff have you ever lined willie up with everyone else to see if others have the same lines??

[G1911]

The varying cut lines exist on, I think, every card in most of the series. 62, 70, there’s a couple years like this.

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by G1911

The varying cut lines exist on, I think, every card in most of the series. 62, 70, there’s a couple years like this.

That isn't a cut line on the bottom of the 1962 Willie Mays, that is how Topps wedded together rows with different wood grain patterns in 1962. This Banks is an example of a card with a different wood grain pattern above it.

[Tedwilliams1918]

I had pictures of other 1962 Mays’s with a really thick black line, but this site just never lets my pictures through

[butchie_t]

Got Mr. Aaron IA with the line across the knee in the mail today.

Another one for the 72 set.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman

That isn't a cut line on the bottom of the 1962 Willie Mays, that is how Topps wedded together rows with different wood grain patterns in 1962. This Banks is an example of a card with a different wood grain pattern above it.

Good to know, I’ve been calling them cut lines for years because they are common in other Topps sets where there is no border change or texture.

[ALR-bishop]

I think Darren outed the 72 Aaron

[butchie_t]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

I think Darren outed the 72 Aaron

I only knew about it from him. Props to Darren, I own one now.

B.T.

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

I think Darren outed the 72 Aaron

That is true...however, I was quickly informed that someone already had it included on their on-line variations list...so my discovery gets an asterisk.

[butchie_t]

I have not seen this posted anywhere within this thread or anywhere else I have looked into on this site.

I believe this to be a variation of the Topps 75 Checklist #646. There is a blue streak that goes from just under the "C" in the word "Cards" at the top left of the card down to the right side of the number 534 in the checklist area.

This is repeatable, I have two of them now and I have seen them listed on eBay as well as COMC but they are not easy to come by. Some that I have seen are badly miscut or the check boxes are filled in. Regardless, they are out there to be found.

Not sure if anyone else may have one but here it is for your review.

Cheers,

Butch

Second picture shows both of them in a side-by-side view.

NOTE: This also appears in the mini set as well. There is a mini example now on COMC.