guess the grade on this card

[camaro69]

I bought this card today from a friend.So PLMK what you may think the
grade of the card is and reason for assigning it that grade in your opinion.
Thanks.

[nebboy]

That all depends on when the card was graded. 10 years ago 5 or 6. Today 2-3 ink print marks are sometimes graded harsh. No matter what it’s a nice card and you have me curious as how graders handled this one.

[camaro69]

Originally Posted by nebboy

That all depends on when the card was graded. 10 years ago 5 or 6.
Today 2-3 ink print marks are sometimes graded harsh. No matter what it’s a nice card and you
have me curious as how graders handled this one.

It was just received back about 4 months ago.So a pretty recent grade.
I will let everyone know the grade after a few more comment.If no one
else comments than I will post the grade on the weekend.

[CardPadre]

Okay, I was going to say new 5, old 7. Doesn’t seem to have a lot of perimeter wear, mostly print and a little dirty maybe contributing to the grade?

[camaro69]

Originally Posted by CardPadre

Okay, I was going to say new 5, old 7. Doesn’t seem to have a lot of perimeter wear, mostly print and a little dirty maybe contributing to the grade?

Thank you for commenting on the card.I appreciate everyone's input.TTYS

[Kurri17]

I am going to say a "4" due to the surface/print marks. I have a card that kind of gives me comparison for that grade, so I will be interested to see.

[philliesfan]

I agree with a 4 because of the comments above.

[camaro69]

OK,enough comments.So here is the grade.There is no
darn way this card should have been given the grade it got.

[CardPadre]

Ooof, that stinks. “Poor” has literally lost all reality-based meaning in grading. The PSA scan makes the card look even better. The only thing I can see as a possible imagined atrocity is maybe some light scuffing/print loss like on the inside his left knee. But even surface wear like that is supposed to be eligible for the 4 or 5 range.

[Joeybats]

I'm convinced sending anything to PSA these days is equivalent to using a randomizer to select a grade. There is no way that card is a 1 in any world. I'm also convinced that SGC grades more accurately and I like their holders better for vintage anyway.