Ruth and Gehrig help

[Leon]

I received these from a forum member who just registered. He was having issues uploading them so here ya go. Any help would be great. Thanks!

[Dubbymc]

Thanks Leon. Everyone this is my item.
I'm seeking expertise from those that may know Ruth and Gehrig signatures to share your opinion om whether these are authentic or not. Please let me know and thanks for your help.

[Bpm0014]

Ruth no good

[Dubbymc]

Thanks. Anything specific about this signature that makes you say this? Just curious to know.

[Bpm0014]

The b the e and the th are completely and totally off. The slant is also off. Especially in regard to the h in relation to the t. It has never in tens of thousands of his autographs ever slant more from one letter to the next. The a is surprisingly accurate. The an and the e are the 2 toughest letters in his name to replicate (in my humble opinion) with forgers almost never able to get those 2 correct. And the forger did a decent job with the a but a horrendous job with the e. For starters haha…

[Bpm0014]

So the more I look at this….

Rarely if ever does a Ruth autograph stump me. I can tell within a couple seconds if a Ruth autograph is good or not. I’ve studied it pretty extensively. However the more I look at this, the more it stumps me. A lot of the letters are rather atypical. However some are “decent”. I’m assuming this is a signed pennant. And I’m wondering if quite simply the pennant was a tough medium to sign. I’d like to hear the story behind this pennant. I’d also like to hear opinions on the Gehrig autograph. Because I believe if one is good, the other is good and vice versa. There’s just some weird things going on with this and I’d like to hear more on it..