![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've begun gathering images of sheets from 1973, and I believe I've detected a pattern that I'd like to validate.
It appears that each series was printed 1) entirely on a 132-card half sheet, AND 2) on a sheet with 6 repeated rows, 2 times. For example, here is a full 132-card series 1 sheet and a sheet on which the first 6 rows are printed twice. Also, here are 2 series 3 sheets which each contain 6 double printed rows. I don't have any examples where I have all 3 version for a single series - e.g. a 132 card sheet and 2 6x sheets. So we think each series was in fact printed in this fashion, and is there any reason to think that this then tied into how the cards were distributed - whether by series or all at once? I have the 2 series 1 sheets shown, a full 132-card series 2 sheet, the 2 series 3 sheets shown, a series 4 sheet with 6 rows (headed by Gene Tenace in the upper left) printed 2x and a series 5 sheet with 6 rows (Twins team in upper left) printed 2x. Any additional sheet images would be appreciated. Thanks! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Kevin studied this extensively, I think he found 66 x 2 sheets for all five Series and 132 card sheets for Series 1 through 3 but not for the 4th and 5th Series if I remember correctly. ETA, I wonder if the variation sheets could be OPC like what happened on the 1976 sheets.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 06-01-2024 at 02:38 PM. Reason: Addition |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just discovered another pattern - Each card in the set is printed with either 1 or 2 asterisks on the reverse.
Sheets with 66x 2 - all cards have either 1 or 2, the series' other 66x2 sheet will have the opposite. On the 132 card sheets, the top half have 1 and the bottom half have 2 - never seen a pattern where cards from the same sheet have differing printing asterisks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5th series sheets I have saved. FYI the one I have labeled OPC is same as the Schmidt sheet below. John
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
schmidt
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not really. Are they saying above that the 73 sheets had A-E codes though?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't seen the 1973 series 2 sheet with the 66 x 2 configuration, headed by card 173, Hal Breeden. However, it has to exist as this miscut of Gibby shows it below Kelly, meaning that Gibby is in the middle of a sheet.
1973_190_below_Kelly_6x2.jpg |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High's - Any uncut sheets or partial sheets known? | G1911 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 464 | 04-27-2025 03:27 PM |
1973 Topps BB sheets | Kevvyg1026 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 06-13-2023 06:19 PM |
Rare 1973 TCMA Reprint Sheets — 1906 Sporting Life Composite, 1940 Reach Composite | TCMA | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 11-02-2020 10:21 PM |
F/S 1973 Topps Complete Set (more coming as time permits) (1970 - 1973 have sold) | frankhardy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 13 | 03-03-2015 12:17 PM |
Why did these topps sheets go for such big $$$?? | whiteymet | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 11-09-2013 05:29 PM |