![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which Card or Neither (assume cost is $5k difference) | |||
Altered |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
64 | 63.37% |
Authentic |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 14.85% |
Neither |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 21.78% |
Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
__________________
BST h2oya311, Jobu, Shoeless Moe, Bumpus Jones, Frankish, Shoeless Moe again, Maddux31, Billycards, sycks22, ballparks, VintageBen (for a friend), vpina87, JimmyC, scmavl, BigFanNY |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Evidence of trimming as it looks nicer. I usually prefer authentic though..
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Holy crap, the TPG actually used the AUTHENTIC label and indicated "evidence of trimming." Yes, I'm surprised. It'd be funny if it were cracked, resubmitted to another TPG and came back with a numerical grade. It's a pseudo-8!
In the past, I thought AUTHENTIC meant the card was pretty trashed (but real) and/or there was evidence of some type of alteration. It's nice to see the TPG actually called out the alteration and labeled it as such. I tell you what, if the price to be paid was less than a "1" (because of the alteration), then I wouldn't mind having it because at least it presents very nice. Edited to add - it'd be nice to see the back and the wear on the rear.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. Last edited by Fred; 01-13-2024 at 06:59 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
__________________
BST h2oya311, Jobu, Shoeless Moe, Bumpus Jones, Frankish, Shoeless Moe again, Maddux31, Billycards, sycks22, ballparks, VintageBen (for a friend), vpina87, JimmyC, scmavl, BigFanNY |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wouldn’t buy either, but if forced to choose, I would go with the trimmed one all day long.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm not a CJ expert. If memory serves me correctly, most or all the 1914s I've owned had staining. Does someone that knows CJs have an estimate of what percentage of 1914 CJs have staining?
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Final result was authentic altered sold for $21.8k (after BP) (20 bidders and 27 bids) the authentic $10.8k (15 bidders 22 bids)
__________________
BST h2oya311, Jobu, Shoeless Moe, Bumpus Jones, Frankish, Shoeless Moe again, Maddux31, Billycards, sycks22, ballparks, VintageBen (for a friend), vpina87, JimmyC, scmavl, BigFanNY |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Altered 1914 Cracker Jack Christy Mathewson | Sean | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 08-04-2022 02:21 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Christy Mathewson PSA Authentic SOLD | t206kid | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 11-02-2020 08:12 AM |
PRICE DROP to $1500 (PICS ADDED) - FS~1914 Cracker Jack ~ Honus Wagner SGC Authentic | CrackaJackKid | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 04-21-2018 05:02 PM |
(PRICE REDUCED) $2350 FS~1914 Cracker Jack ~ Ty Cobb SGC Authentic | CrackaJackKid | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 03-28-2018 05:11 PM |
Recently purchased 1914 Cracker Jack Ty Cobb - Authentic? | poorlydrawncat | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-27-2012 11:08 AM |