 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-04-2022, 09:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
A New One On Me
A seller on eBay recently listed a 1967 Topps #573 Chicago White Sox Team card as an error with the Cleveland Indians 1966 stats printed on the back rather than the 1966 White Sox stats printed on the back, at first I thought it might be a rare variation but after looking at several other 1967 #573 White Sox Team cards I realized that all of them were printed that way and it was never corrected. I imagine some members here are aware of this error but I couldn't find any documentation of it anywhere.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 10-04-2022 at 09:15 PM. Reason: Missed a word 
|
|
#2
10-04-2022, 09:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If the card came out these days, it would be explained that the Indians (whatever they are called now) players 'identified' as White Sox.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land  https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. 
|
|
#3
10-05-2022, 12:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1967 tops 573 white Sox team
Quote:
|
|
#4
10-05-2022, 07:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for posting Cliff. I had not been aware of that or seen any reference to it
|
|
#6
10-05-2022, 08:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
10-05-2022, 08:58 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I took advantage of my editing privileges on Trading Card Database to denote the 1967 Topps #573 White Sox Team card as an UER with the stats of the 1966 Indians rather than the 1966 White Sox. It is shocking to me that such a huge error card has gone under the radar all of these years even though it was never corrected. ETA, I see now at least one publication recognized it.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 10-05-2022 at 11:50 AM. Reason: Addition
|
|
#8
10-05-2022, 02:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nozaki's work goes back a ways. It was the foundation for Gilkeson's publications on variations which is now being updated by Mike Cady
http://baseballcardvariationsguidebo...wordpress.com/
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
