New T206 Wagner?

[atx840]

Anyone have the history on this newly graded example?

[3-2-count]

Hi Chris. I don't, but it sure is PERTY!!

[mrreality68]

Originally Posted by 3-2-count

Hi Chris. I don't, but it sure is PERTY!!

+1 Agree and I am sure it will also sell for a perty amount

[cannonballsun]

How many T206 Wagner's are now known ? I think I heard around 70, from somewhere. That could be way off, though.

[CobbSpikedMe]

I'm in the "those-corners-have-been-touched-up" camp. They definitely look different from scan to scan.



.

[19cbb]

Oy Vey

[ullmandds]

looks like one of the "doctors" got to the top edge...and then got it through SGC with the ultimate grading bump from A to 2.5.

Beautiful example btw!

[jsfriedm]

Is this one up for auction?

[frankbmd]

Even a card doctor would be courageous to treat a Wags regardless of his compensation.

[sbfinley]

Originally Posted by CobbSpikedMe

I'm in the "those-corners-have-been-touched-up" camp. They definitely look different from scan to scan.

Just to make sure we’re all on the same. We’re talking about the card in the OP with 2 frayed corners, a splitting corner, and a clipped corner?

[CobbSpikedMe]

Originally Posted by sbfinley

Just to make sure we’re all on the same. We’re talking about the card in the OP with 2 frayed corners, a splitting corner, and a clipped corner?

Hi Steven,

I'm commenting on how the two cards (the SGC 2.5 and the raw one from the collage third row down third card over) look like the corners have been improved from the raw one to the SGC one.




.

[GasHouseGang]

Could it be the 3rd row, 3rd column Wagner?

[npa589]

Gotta be - pretty unique mark on the top left quadrant of the card

[D. Bergin]

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

Could it be the 3rd row, 3rd column Wagner?

Looks like it. Maybe the scanner contrast turned up on the graded version to flatten out a lot of the edge wear you can see in that collage shot.

I wonder if that's a reholder, because no way that's a 2.5 with the way SGC has been grading things lately.

[GasHouseGang]

I blew up the collage photo and trimmed out the 3rd row/3rd column card. It looks like the same card, but the edges don't look as rough in the graded copy.

[D. Bergin]

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

I blew up the collage photo and trimmed out the 3rd row/3rd column card. It looks like the same card, but the edges don't look as rough in the graded copy.

Don't think it's any funny business, I think that's just the function of the scanner setting turning the contrast up on the graded copy and flattening out the whitish edges.

Also, makes that scuff mark look more pronounced in the process.

[atx840]

@Bryan, the grid of Wagners seems to be from here.

Hauls of Shame

http://haulsofshame.com/blog/wp-cont...1-40-Final.jpg

[brianp-beme]

From the collage, it is interesting to note the wide awake Honus versus the sleepy Honus. Here are examples next to each other in the third row.

Brian

[T205 GB]

Originally Posted by D. Bergin

Looks like it. Maybe the scanner contrast turned up on the graded version to flatten out a lot of the edge wear you can see in that collage shot.

I wonder if that's a reholder, because no way that's a 2.5 with the way SGC has been grading things lately.

I am sure SGC cupped the owners sack while he graded it himself just like PSA does. We don't have enough money to get preferential treatment like that.

IMO I agree that the borders look like they have been pressed. Also why use SGC when you know a PSA holder brings more? Probably ten of thousands more easily.

[fkm_bky]

First thought...what a beautiful card. You couldn't get deeper color or better registry if you tried.

Second thought...how the hell is that a 2.5 with that top edge alone?

Bill

[Exhibitman]

A: It is the same card, just a difference in scans.

B: It hasn't been trimmed. Recently. It does look trimmed before.

[brunswickreeves]

Originally Posted by fkm_bky

First thought...what a beautiful card. You couldn't get deeper color or better registry if you tried.

Second thought...how the hell is that a 2.5 with that top edge alone?

Bill

For the same reason there will never be a 4th PSA 10 1952 Topps Mick...protect the integrity of what's already been graded and those investors/owners.

[Steve D]

Originally Posted by brunswickreeves

If even the same card, the SGC 2.5 vsn's bottom left corner to about 50% in toward the center has been trimmed. The 2.5 vsn is much less equidistant (and even more angled) to the card's inner boarder than 3rd row 3rd card vsn.

I wonder if 2.5 vsn is altered throughout. Something's off on it...seems much too bright and crisp...also, Wag's jersey on left side is bleeding/crosses over the card's inner boarder into the boarder.

Originally Posted by T205 GB

IMO I agree that the boarders look like they have been pressed. Also why use SGC when you know a PSA holder brings more? Probably ten of thousands more easily.

It's "borders"; NOT "boarders"

"Boarders" are people (non-family members) who are living in someone else's house (such as a boarding house).


Steve

[brunswickreeves]

Originally Posted by Steve D

It's "borders"; NOT "boarders"

"Boarders" are people (non-family members) who are living in someone else's house (such as a boarding house).


Steve

Thanks! How the hell did I ever earn an MBA from Babson when I can't spell?! Thank goodness finance is my core competency and not grammer

[Jobu]

Where are those scans from?

It looks to me like the OP's card might be the one David suggests but that card doesn't seem to be listed on the T206 Resource:

https://t206resource.com/Wagner-Gallery.html

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

Could it be the 3rd row, 3rd column Wagner?

[TCMA]

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

Could it be the 3rd row, 3rd column Wagner?

I've posted this elsewhere but still worth noting. The Honus in lower left corner is a Dover reprint which was based off of the Honus directly above it.