![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the past 5-6 years, I have been working on a Topps run of the sets I initially collected as a kid (1973-1979). My normal set approach is to build out a raw set w as close to NM as I can afford and pick up about 10% of the cards in graded form as duplicates. I recently have been upgrading some of the raw cards in my completed sets: 1973, 1975, 1976, 1977 - - which tends to burn me out on the cost of buying NM singles.
So - when I decided over the weekend to have a crack at building the 1974 set, I decided to take a different approach for fun: build out a LOW GRADE set, and start with the original cards that I bought as a 7 year-old back in 1974. Going through my old rough cards was way more fun than I even imagined and putting together the base of a set without caring (too much) about quality was a blast. I know there are Mid-Grade collectors on here, but has anyone else tried anything similar to what I've started? I figure a few cheap large Lot Buys in lower grade should get me 90%+ of the way home. I have 39 PSA graded. A few stats - I always assumed that I bought fairly evenly throughout the season, but these stats make me think I may have loaded up later: I had 503 total cards: - 316 unique cards for the base set of 660 (344 to go) - 122 were dups (I had 12 triples and 5 quadruples of the same cards!) - 65 were "Traded" - I'd say I had doubles or triples of 10+ Traded Cards - only 1 Washington variation and 10 other San Diego cards - 4 seriously mis-cut cards & an appropriate number of wax/gum stains As a Cincinnati Reds fan, I always felt like they must limit the number of Reds in our market to get us to buy more. Out of the 438 base cards, I only had 12 Reds = 2.7% (vs. the expected 4.5% expected 30/660) - proving the conspiracy. Just kidding. Anyway, I'll probably build out a NM raw set down the line - but maybe not - if this keeps being this much fun (and cheap), I may take a crack at some other sets, too... Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan,
I'm doing the same the thing with the same run, 1973-1979 and working on 1977 now. Let me know if you need any 1979 cards (I have an 800 count box) and have any extra 1977s? Mike |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I actually did the exact same thing as you for my 1975's...
My 73 on up are all NM, 76 and up I bought whole from vending lots and 73 & 74 I built from NM. I have tons of cards in those years from my youth...my 78-80 sets I actually have two...the ones I bought mint and my childhood sets that I have kept...and they were well loved. My 75 cards I had as a kid were VG at best, some better, some worse...and I had about 2/3rds of the set. I decided to build from there picking up first what I needed, and upgrading on occasion. The set quickly came together as all I needed were mostly commons. Grabbing 20 or 30 here and there from shows etc and the set really became a long term deal. I started this about 7 years or so ago, and just last week I picked up 10 cards as upgrades. Now every once in a while I'll grab the set in the evenings...crack a beer...and just go through the binder looking for upgrades. Getting harder and harder and I'd say I'm about 97% NM with lots of VG doubles...had a lot of fun doing that. I remember at the time I could have bought a NM set for about $300 (much more now) and I am sure I have spent more with this approach, but I made that decision to "build" and I appreciate this set that much more... Good luck!
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 122/160 76% |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I haven't tried the building a whole set in low grade, but I have found as a rule that I have a lot more fun collecting low grade cards than high grade. Aside from being cheaper, I don't have to worry about things like accidentally dinging a corner, because someone else did that for me way back when.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is how I do all my sets - no attention paid to condition, not a graded card in sight. Anything slabbed gets cracked out upon acquisition, and 95% of my cards are not even kept sleeved at all, just loose in boxes. It's more fun this way, and when every corner is dinged there's not much point in penny sleeves and top loaders.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sort of how I did mine, late 73 and 74 were my first years buying any good number of packs. Had 74-76 mostly complete and just never really stopped. I also didn't put much effort into finding the missing ones in 77-8 once I moved to a place with a card store.
So I didn't finish the 74 set until sometime in the late 90's, Still not done with 75, or 75 mini Something like 9 or 11 cards from 76. 77-83 I completed. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to approach the T206 spreadsheet | Kevin | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 09-23-2021 08:21 PM |
When (and when not) to grade... your approach? | Belfast1933 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-02-2021 08:04 PM |
set-building approach | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-11-2015 04:28 PM |
Approach to Building Sets | Matthew80 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 27 | 03-16-2012 08:16 PM |
Topps for sale: 1960, 1974 Deckle Edge, 1974 Puzzle, 1975 Mini, 1976 | mets41 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-17-2011 03:01 AM |