NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-26-2021, 01:28 PM
Kutcher55 Kutcher55 is online now
J@son Per1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 666
Default Question on 41 Playball Copyright Variation

Hoping someone can educate me or direct me to a prior thread that covered this topic. I was just made aware of a variation in the '41 Playball set. To be clear, I'm not talking about the paper version -- that is a separate topic. Instead I'm curious about the difference between the cards that have just the "C" (copyright) symbol on the back lower left corner as opposed to the cards that have the "C - 1941" symbol. I checked my set and 25 of my 71 cards (I'm one card short) have the '1941', all of them within the early (#1-48) part of the set so I suspect the variation was not extended to cards 49-72 but I would like to confirm this. Additional questions.

1. Is one version rarer than the other?

2. Are there differences in the card stock and/or size of the cards? When I did an informal survey of my own set it appears as though the ones with just the 'C' have slightly larger dimensions and aren't quite as bone-white as the ones that include 1941. This might just be coincidental because I only looked at a handful of cards.

3. Is there any value difference between the two versions, particularly on the key cards?

Any other info the experts might be able to share is greatly appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26-2021, 02:32 PM
Harford20's Avatar
Harford20 Harford20 is offline
Dave H@rford
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 571
Default

Although my data is limited to a single 1941 card, #14 Ted Williams, I tracked sales of the variations over several years. My data was limited to graded cards due to the vast number of reprints for this set (and what I was planning on purchasing).

1. For Ted, just the "C" (copyright) symbol was about 25% of the graded card sales, and the the "C - 1941" symbol was 75% of sales.

2. My cards were only purchased graded here, so cannot provide info on this

3. There really was no "premium" for the "C" (copyright) symbol, but as these were much less common, it took me far longer (actually years) to find the card that fit my collection with this variation.

David
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2021, 02:36 PM
LuckyLarry's Avatar
LuckyLarry LuckyLarry is online now
L@rry T1p+0n
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,927
Default

from the Standard Catalog

__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2021, 09:56 AM
Kutcher55 Kutcher55 is online now
J@son Per1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 666
Default

Thanks both. That makes sense. My Ted has the 1941 btw. Of the 47 cards I have between 1-48, 25 of them, or 53% have the 1941. If we take that and the research done by Dave H, that would suggest that the 1941 cards are slightly more prolific in the early series. Not enough data to conclude that so it would be nice to hear other people’s set breakdown — at least those like me who were unaware of the variation.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2021, 11:47 AM
LuckyLarry's Avatar
LuckyLarry LuckyLarry is online now
L@rry T1p+0n
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,927
Default

I just thumbed through my set. 31 of the 48 cards have @1941

Larry
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2021, 02:38 PM
Kutcher55 Kutcher55 is online now
J@son Per1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 666
Default

I am messing around with Excel, trying to determine the relative scarcity of #49-72 vs 1-48. If both the first printing in 1941 and the second printing in 1942 was the same size in total, based on an estimate that the '@ 1941' comprise ~60% of the total final population of 1-48 (using the above 3 data points to estimate this), this would imply that overall 49-72 is 2.5x more scarce than 1-48 (inclusive of the "@" and "@1941" population). However, we only could conclude that if we make the very big assumption that both print sizes were the same.

But we have another piece of data: Based on the pricing of commons in various price guides I have seen, the 49-72 series doesn't provide that level of difference in value -- typically from what I have seen the later series commons sell for 1.25x to 1.5x that of 1-48. Which would suggest that the second printing (the "@" only cards in 1942), which contained 1-72 might have been somewhat larger than the initial printing of 1-48.

I guess I would conclude that the second printing was between 1 and 1.5x as big as the first printing. If it was more than 1.5x bigger we would have more '@' in the 1-48 population during our informal survey because it would overcome the fact that there were 50% more cards to print (1-72) in the second printing.

This all assumes that they printed a uniform # of each card # in each printing and there were no SPs.

Clearly I have too much time on my hands on a rainy Wednesday.

Last edited by Kutcher55; 10-27-2021 at 02:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-29-2021, 05:05 AM
LuckyLarry's Avatar
LuckyLarry LuckyLarry is online now
L@rry T1p+0n
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,927
Default

Here the wantlist of a friend

1941 Playball with 1941 copyright: NEED 17 20 22 26 27 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 43 45 47

1941 Playball w/o copyright: NEED 1 2 4 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 21 23 24 30 31 32 42
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Variation in size on 1940 Playball snagltooth Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 07-07-2020 09:49 AM
1939 joe dimaggio playball psa 2.5 QUESTION soxfan1986 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 3 05-08-2015 07:20 AM
PSA Copyright question smotan_02 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 15 03-01-2013 03:22 AM
copy/copyright question Ladder7 Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 11 05-03-2012 07:29 PM
1941 Playball - Variation - Flaws - Fakes or ??? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 12-04-2006 11:03 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 AM.


ebay GSB