![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which do you like best? | |||
T205 Cobb SGC 80 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
64 | 49.61% |
T205 Cobb PSA 4.5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
65 | 50.39% |
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Easy question. Which of these do you like best?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-20-2021 at 10:27 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if i vote 4.5, can i buy it?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LOL....after what I had to pay for it you wouldn't want it. Both of these will reside in my collection....probably permanently or until I sell my collection again (I have no reason to at this time. )
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would take either card.
Not an easy question. Both cards look really good I am not sure I can pick one over the other. If I had to choose I would probably pick the 4.5
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the 4.5. Wear on the bottom corners is less pronounced and the text on the back is sharper. But they're both beautiful cards.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 4.5, because it has a little more of an "I'm an old card that still looks nice" vibe vs. "I'm an old card that is trying too hard to look like a shiny new card", which, whether or not it has been tampered with (not saying that it has been and probably hasn't), still always leaves a negative impression in my lower condition brain.
Brian |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you're a flip freak, then PSA. If you only care about the higher numerical grade then SGC. Perhaps the question should be about subjectivity and which card is felt to be most accurately graded.
If there was a huge difference in price, I'd take the PSA4.5 card.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
4.5 easy choice for me. Both great cards
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Are the borders of the PSA 4.5 that much shinier than the SGC 6 or is it just the pictures?
__________________
194/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 131/208 T205s 42/108? Diamond Stars |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the look of the front better on the psa
__________________
HOFAutoRookies.com |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC 6
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sgc 6
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Easy choice for me, the SGC has less wear, I would take that one first.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a centering freak, both pass muster to me. Only then do I look at the back, and the SGC wins there pretty easily.
Last edited by slightlyrounded; 10-20-2021 at 07:17 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It yawl look at the numbers in the poll they are almost dead even. And if I vote for the 6 it would be even (as of a few minutes ago). I haven't voted because I don't know!! And that is how I ended up with 2.
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-21-2021 at 07:31 AM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd choose the psa example due to stronger bolder image and perfect focus/registry.
The sgc appears to have a slight color shift and throws off the image detail just a bit, and washed out colors compared to the psa example. But either would look nice in my binder ![]()
__________________
Collection on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/139478047@N03/albums |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My SGC 4, which I've had since the late 1990s:
__________________
194/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 131/208 T205s 42/108? Diamond Stars |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 Goudey Ruth, Gehrig, T205 Wallace 1-line, T205 Cobb!!! | Runscott | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 02-26-2013 09:46 PM |
FS; T205 McGraw SGC 60, T206 Cobb Tolstoi SGC 10, T205 Dahlen PSA 4.5 | Ladder7 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-21-2011 04:41 PM |
lower price! t206's, t205's, t205 cobb, w. johnson,'53 psa 2 mantle + for only $900 | benderbroeth | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 15 | 07-14-2011 07:33 AM |
WTB: T202 Cobb; T205 Young; Colgan Cobb | David R | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-21-2010 06:30 PM |
Accepting Offers T205 Cobb MathewsonT206 Cobb Green and Red | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 01-12-2009 04:17 PM |