![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
just curious if you send a checklist to be graded and its been marked, do they consider that altered ? or is altered only for trimmed cards ?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For PSA standards any pencil or ink marks will get a qualifier of "MK" or mark. Hell maybe even a shit stain will get an MK these days. I don't even know anymore.
![]() If you want to get really deep you could say that finger prints is altered stock. If a card has been touched it's no longer good. I know how some card collectors can get really obsessive about this stuff and I won't argue their point. It is what it is. Last edited by Goudey77; 11-08-2019 at 03:08 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agreed; those would get the mark qualifier. If someone tried to erase the pencil marks, it should then get the PSA Authentic Altered label.
If it's a ball-point pen and damages the card, the grade will also suffer compared to one with light pencil marks or felt tip markers that do not damage the surface of the card.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, what about a waxed/ gum card ? What's the grade on them ? I'v all ways put them at ex cond's ?
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA has a Stain qualifier, so an otherwise Gem Mint card would get a PSA 9(ST) which would equate to around a PSA 7 price. The eye appeal or the likelihood of a buyer to remove the stains/wax would also affect the sale price.
Listing a raw card as EX is probably a reasonable way to sell most of them. That's presuming the gum stain does not actually damage the surface of the card (it could have caused bubbling, paper loss, etc).
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rarest Qualifier is
OF MD |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA grading question | ajjohnsonsoxfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-02-2015 11:08 AM |
PSA Grading Question | yankees23 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-20-2015 12:01 PM |
SGC Grading Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-06-2009 04:57 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
sgc grading question for y'all | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-16-2005 04:32 PM |