![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After a looong time looking, thrilled to finally have the Williams College ‘number-on-front’ (NOF) variation in my hands, in any condition. While the base T51 set has been relatively easy to put together, the 25 NOF cards have been much tougher for me. The Wiliams NOF variation is widely considered to be the first first basketball card produced and relevant because the Williams Ephs were arguably the top team in the country at the time of issuance (according to the Premo-Porretta_Power_Poll). This variation has a current PSA pop of only 2 but likely is only a tiny fraction of the overall ungraded population.
Even though there seems to be a general consensus that the NOF variations pre-dated the non-numbered issues, I haven’t see much mention as to why - I think the answer lies in the T6 redemption coupons that were included with each Murad cigarette pack: My theory is the 'premium’ coupons (as well as the backs of the T6 cabinet cards themselves) were mistakenly printed with alphabetical numbering that differed from the actual T51 card-fronts themselves. So, the Williams T51 card reads #14 but the coupon has Williams College at #24. Because the coupon specifically requests the redeemer to “Write plainly your name and address, and order picture desired by number….” its safe to say that some collectors would have used the numbers on the coupon while others would have made their college request based off the T51 numbering. The resulting headache/confusion let to the small numbering being knocked of the printing plates mid run and the subsequent 1-25 series (First Edition) were printed as the more common “no-number” variety. So that’s my case - Would love to hear other theories. Finally - realizing this is a baseball card forum, here’s some relevant red meat in a few variations: |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hmm; it's possible. I figured with the 1911 date on those coupons to redeem for the T6s, those would have been inserted in packs more around the time of the 2nd edition printing.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
(a bit blurry but states at bottom College series will be ready to mail on June 1st, 1910) If you look at other ATC coupons that share that same expiry date, there is pretty clear evidence that all were being produced no later than early 1910. For instance with the T3 premiums, here's a Turkey Red coupon: And a Fez: What I'm less sure of is the T51 timing - would love to see some evidence they were being issued in 1909 as commonly suggested. If they were, maybe the NOF variations were standard prior to the redemption coupons being included in cigarette packs; Then, when the T6 offer started, ATC decided to scrap the original numbering system and removed these from the T51 printing plates? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's a plausible explanation. I think the 1909 date comes from their similarity with the T206 and T205 issues.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reviving this old thread with some post-pandemic questions:
1) What do you think the value today of the #14 (NOF) Williams card would be? 2) The only population figures that I can find separating the Murad cards into NOF, 1st series, and 2nd series pops is years old; what's the best way to go about estimating how many of each are still in existence for Williams? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My question in reposting this thread, though, was not so much about dates as about ratios.
Is there any up-to-date way to calculate how many NOF T51s there are relative to other 1st series cards? I can't find anything post-pandemic, even though the hobby exploded since. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That ratio looks about right to me. For comparison, Michigan’s pop report is 3 NOF, 8 1st edition (regular, no number), and 30 2nd edition. Last edited by slightlyrounded; 04-25-2025 at 02:10 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, great. That's what I wanted to find.
Is that page/info available to the public, or do you have to be a PSA member (which I am not)? |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
https://www.psacard.com/pop/multi-sp...e-series/49281 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Probably worth mentioning that PSA has not done a great job segregating the series variations in this set. Initially there was no "NOF" differentiation, so no doubt some of the early pop counts will contain both. Also, PSA has a separate 1910 pop report for 2nd Edition cards. I have no idea if this is still active.
https://www.psacard.com/pop/multi-sp...e-series/49282 Jeff |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A little bit of conspiracy theory | JTysver | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 11 | 07-05-2018 06:33 AM |
FS 1952 Topps High Number PSA 6.5 Billey Meyer Centered High Number | 1952boyntoncollector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 10-12-2014 08:30 PM |
The new economic theory.... | ramram | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 14 | 08-16-2011 10:27 AM |
In Theory | mintacular | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-18-2011 06:17 AM |
T206 - Cubs w/ all back variations. 559 variations!!?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-26-2009 08:28 AM |