![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am not a collector of autographs. But I did have a vintage one in my collection that I wanted to be authenticated/encapsulated. I got the card back from PSA and they authenticated and graded the signature. Everything good so far.
Here is my question. Evidently when I was submitting, being unfamiliar with the grading of cards with signatures, I did not request the card to be graded. What I received on the label does not indicate that it is an authentic 1929 Zeenut card, but instead just as 'Trading Card'. Will the fact that it is not identified on the label as an authentic 1929 Zeenut card hurt the value and diminish bidding activity if I were to send it to an auction house? Would collectors believe it to be a reprint? Brian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ehh, people have made worse mistakes. If it's real though, it's real. And, I can't imagine that there are many-if any-players that appeared in that set that lived to the reprint era.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Brian |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not a tactical mistake. Their blue flips no longer designate the card. If you want to add the card grading or authentication, it's not much more. But I don't think it will affect the sales price much.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You wouldn't have been the only one. I don't follow the blue/red flips, but would have assumed, grade or not, that the card would be listed on the flip. Obviously, that would have been my ignorance not their fault-- bit it would be nice to have the card listed on the label.
Duly note that if you do consign it through one of the big auction houses they will list it as and testify that is an authentic Zeenut and that should suffice for sale. If REA or whomever says the card itself is authentic, that will be enough for buyers. Last edited by drcy; 07-07-2018 at 05:22 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If it were my card I'd probably send it back and get it in a red flip. Especially if it will get a numerical card grade above authentic.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How could PSA make a mistake like this on a Babe Ruth Exhibit Card?????? | whiteymet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-15-2014 01:17 PM |
This isn't P. Smith is it?? Grading Co. mistake? | sandmountainslim | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-13-2012 08:54 PM |
Autographed Card Grading | Easy506 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 09-06-2009 08:17 PM |
ok...T204 Ramly Plank...how big of a mistake did I make?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 99 | 12-19-2007 06:11 PM |
I guess everyone can make a mistake | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-08-2007 11:30 AM |