![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Due to the elevated popularity in today's hobby almost every card in the 1914 set is obtainable considering you have deep enough pockets for some. But the two heavyweights that are considerably the toughest I feel are the Forest Cady and the Del Pratt. Current Population reports..
Cady PSA-12 SGC-9 21 Total Pratt PSA-14 SGC-10 24 Total Although I've heard many people reference the Pratt as the toughest card to obtain I feel the Cady takes the cake. Not only due to the pop reports but in the last two years since I have been following these cards hot and heavy I've seen twice as many Pratts come up for sale then Cadys. Just curious as to what everyone else's take on it is.... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also think the Cady is the toughest. Last time I had one was 25-30 years ago. I sold a Pratt last year.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It seems like the Pratt should be the toughest. A collector trying to assemble a "master set" of Cracker Jacks could settle for a 1915 Cady, but he would need the 1914 Pratt to complete the set.
In the last Goodwin there was a Cady and a Pratt, both graded 3.5. The Cady sold for around $3,500, but the Pratt went for $7,800 if I remember correctly. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are a couple of others like Becker and Keating, which have very similar low pops on PSA and SGC. They get premiums, but not quite like Cady and Pratt.
Becker has a 24 pop (15 and 9), so same as Pratt, but a PSA 1 (albeit rough) just went for $405 a few days ago. A premium for sure, but nowhere near Cady / Pratt territory, for one deemed just as tough per the pop reports. Is it more like perceived relative toughness of those, since it's known that they're hard to find, vs. actually checking the pop reports to see a few other similar tough cards not getting those same premiums? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But then you have cards like the Sherry Magee that have a 34 total pop but yet rarely surface for sale and fetch a vast premium. Just like the Cady, very Low Pop and rarely surfaces. Plus the pop reports are probably off due to crossovers. I know of one Cady for sure that did. I'm still convinced it's Cady.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my opinion the Cady is more rare, although the Pratt carries the stigma of this elusive unicorn. Also think there are some other cards that are very rare as well according to the pop reports but do not sell for near the premium that Pratty or Cady do.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
good news for those seeking some of the rarer cracker jack cards with low pops.
in the 1970's their were a lot of big collectors who just loved cards, they were not investors. investors did not really exist in the hobby for the most part in the mid-70's. these big time collectors would never have a card graded (when grading did finally arrive). they had the cash and they had the access to cracker jack cards that were only 40, 50 yrs old when they started accumulating in the 1950's onward. think about that for a minute, in 1964 the cracker jacks were 50 yrs old. today 1952 topps are 65 yrs old and very few people were serious collectors until the mid 1970's so their was no real huge reason to save 1952 topps for the most part until the early 1970's YET a large qty of those 52 topps cards exist today, go look at how many high number mickeys exist for perspective. stuff has a way of hanging around. some of these guys are still around and not active, most are quite old. (i have no cards anymore so no need to ask). most of these guys passed on and their heirs are still SITTING on their cards. condition was not always great, by todays slab stds (and sometimes suspicious slabbed cards) but all that mattered was you completed a set. my point is their are a lot more of the old sets out their then people of today realize, and it is a big question as to when they will enter the hobby again. more perspective: about 27 yrs ago a friend of mine took me to see one of the worlds greatest "xyz" collections (for the owners, privacy i won't even mention the non sports category i am using to make this point). i personally held 2 of a rare item which only about 50 were known to exist, yet here in my hand were 2 that were not known by that hobby of 1990 ( other then me and the my friend, they are still not known in the respective hobby. ) in 1990 and today, these items were pricewise comporable to t-206 wagners, and that was just the tip of the iceberg of what was in that safe. this collection was assembled in the early 1900's and was known 110 yrs ago. by 1990 it was unknown and remains unknown to the xyz hobby. the person i knew who took me to see the collection was a big time collector of this mystery category and did not know the collection existed. this was ironic since my friend had a VERY close connection with the heirs of the collection. he was stunned when i told him what was sortof hiding under his nose so to speak. he checked and verified the collection was still intact and had sat in a safe pretty much undisturbed since the 1920's. only because of my friends personal connection did i get to tag along and see it. (i learned of it from old publications... think that one through for a minute and that is how you may find what you seek!!) for further perspective, in the room the very large safe was in, they had a very rare item on display, it was fading in the sun for the better part of 70 or more yrs, YIKES!!. i was told to shut my yap and not make any suggestions - (like GET THAT ITEM OUT OF THE SUN!!!!). the owners were, shall we say, kinda touchy. if i opened my yap my friend would never be allowed back to visit. and interestingly enough my friend and i were the only two people in the room. the current owner let us in, opened the safe and came back a few hours later. that collection has sat intact to this day from what i understand. from what we gathered no one besides the owners had set their eyes on the collection since at least the 1930's. money cannot buy this collection. (no i do not have any collections of anything today, most of my stuff was non sports cards related and ended up gifted to museums, so i have no axe to grind. my wife and i became minimalists). i have known this to be the case in other very high end collectibles where i have known owners of the item that were definately not counted in the guesstimated total pops of their non sport hobby. so back to your question, their may be only 10 to 15 possible floating around, so to speak, according to grading company pops, of 1914 cracker jack sets in sight. but their may well be twice that many 1914 cracker jack complete sets. the others are just not visible. 25 to 30 would be my guess based on my 1970's wandering around. some of them may shake loose someday. all the best, Last edited by jsq; 07-10-2017 at 11:10 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A very late response to this post as I searched the internet to find some CJ answers. I think there are still a lot more collections to be found. It seems they happen almost monthly, if not more.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-09-2017 at 09:35 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS 1914 Cracker Jack - Del Pratt, Ray Caldwell, Josh Devore | wolterse | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 10-22-2015 11:17 AM |
1914 Cracker Jack #93 Del Pratt PSA 1 | esd70433 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 02-22-2014 01:43 PM |
It's back. 1914 Cracker Jack Pratt in Legendary. | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-18-2012 09:55 PM |
1914 cracker jack Pratt | Mrvintage | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-17-2011 05:13 PM |
WTB: 1914 Cracker Jack #93 Del Pratt | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 08-20-2008 03:05 PM |