 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-29-2016, 08:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
1953 Bowman Pee Wee Reese - Crossover to PSA
Hi All,
I have a 1953 Bowman Pee Wee Reese BVG 5 that I bought a couple of years ago from a member of this board. Since then I have upgraded and am looking to sell this card. Question for the group: Am I better off trying to cross it over to PSA or should I sell it "as is"? Thanks! I apologize about my scans... I cannot for the life of me get it to look clearer...
__________________
Actively building a 1953 Bowman Color PSA Registry Set (Currently 150/160) and attempting a 1947 Tip Top Bread Set. 
|
|
#3
11-29-2016, 10:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Even if it were a PSA 4, you'd probably do better (especially with that centering) than if the card remained in the BVG 5 holder. At the very least, you'd get about the same price but be able to sell it much faster.
|
|
#4
11-30-2016, 03:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Try to cross with a min grade of 4.5; I would think it has a good shot.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#5
11-30-2016, 05:34 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am in the camp of believers that the unwritten rule of PSA is that all competitors cards get a minimum 1 point downgrade even if under graded to keep their reputation of superiority.
Crack it and you would likely get a higher grade than sent slabbed. Personally I like the BVG cases more as they don't look as cheap as the other companies. However, I am in the minority. IMHO (name above  )
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.
|
|
#6
11-30-2016, 05:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's a recap of my recent crossover attempt: pretty good results.
http://www.blowoutcards.com/forums/11604218-post7.html
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#7
11-30-2016, 07:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
|
#8
11-30-2016, 10:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As a buyer I seek out BVG in my searches as I find their grading the most accurate, standard and least subjective. In addition, the cases are less likely to be fake or tampered. It's also fantastic to get a great deal on a beautiful card because someone feels that Kleenex is better than Puffs. As a seller, you sadly need to crack and send to PSA to get the best return.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 11-30-2016 at 10:59 AM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1953 Bowman Reese - Crossover or Sell | STL1944 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 09-19-2016 03:54 PM |
| FS: 1953 Bowman Color #33 Pee Wee Reese PSA 5 | wilkiebaby11 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-20-2015 08:28 AM |
| FS: 1953 Bowman Color #33 Pee Wee Reese PSA 3 | wilkiebaby11 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 10-22-2015 08:33 AM |
| WTB: Reese Bowman 1953 | Ericc22 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-16-2011 12:46 PM |
| WTB: 1953 Pee Wee Reese Bowman #33 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-31-2008 10:06 AM |
Hybrid Mode
