 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-03-2016, 03:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
PSA mistake cost seller or did he?
This card is flapped as a E90-1 but is really an E106. Bresahan was not a CUB in 1909-11. The bad flap and Corresponding listing problem cost seller some money I'm guessing. I fill I would have to pay a more if sold as a E106.
So question is - * Did PSA cost the seller. * Is it seller that should have known his cards better before selling. * Both got it wrong. * I should have sent him a message through E-Bay for a heads up at error. Last edited by nebboy; 09-03-2016 at 03:06 PM. 
|
|
#3
09-03-2016, 03:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
most e106s are much tougher than e90-1...of course there are exceptions. this is a pathetic...rookie mistake that should never be allowed to happen...never imo. hard to say if this cost seller as more people probably collect e90-1 than e106...and I have no idea what it sold for!
|
|
#4
09-03-2016, 03:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are a few difficult e90-1s but I don't remember if Bressy is one of them. If he isn't, and I don't think he is but am not sure, and the seller didn't sell it as an E106, he and PSA cost himself money.
__________________
Leon Luckey
|
|
#5
09-03-2016, 03:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Did you buy the card? If not I would have sent the seller a heads up so he can get it holdered correctly.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
|
|
#6
09-03-2016, 04:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Should have been fixed as a mechanical error (free shipping both ways and reholder). But if the card was incorrectly identified in the auction, that's on the seller, too.
Most likely, that's what the original submitter sent it in as, and PSA didn't double-check their id.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| This is a mistake by BVG, right? | pbspelly | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-18-2014 11:15 AM |
| Another Mistake by JSA | shelly | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 05-16-2013 05:44 PM |
| mistake | daviddbreadman | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 11-09-2009 05:04 PM |
| Just observing my cost as a seller | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-02-2005 08:52 PM |
| A mistake, again! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-26-2005 07:42 AM |
Hybrid Mode
