PSA vs. GGC web sites

[Snapolit1]

Much prefer PSA website when searching for population report. Like the way it gives you the entire year and you can then see the whole series in a glance and then zero in on specific card. Many times I get errors on SGC because I dont know precisely what the exact set name is or where there is a variation in player name. Nowhere near as user friendly.

Plus sometimes with SGC I just get zeros across the board and I have no idea whether that's a real output or just some kind of default error message because I did something wrong. Doesn't give you any info on what you are looking at.

Bad web design many levels.

[sbfinley]

People can proclaim it be grading standards or reputation, but the singular reason PSA has cemented itself as the industry leader is that instituted a user-friendly set registry and when they first saw its popularity they ran with it.

[4815162342]

PSA's website works great; especially the mobile version.

FYI, you might want to double check this thread's title.

[pclpads]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Bad web design many levels.

+ 1 . . . Not user friendly. Haven't used it in years.

[bcornell]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

...Bad web design many levels.

Why do you get to post anonymously? How about putting your name to your opinions?

[Snapolit1]

Easy pal. Who peed in your Cheerios this morning?

I expressed an opinion that I don't care for their website. I didn't say they were crooks or defrauding people or despicable businessmen. In fact I have previously posted that I love their slabs and far prefer them to the competition. I voiced an opinion. Wasn't calling their integrity into question.

[glchen]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Easy pal. Who peed in your Cheerios this morning?

I expressed an opinion that I don't care for their website. I didn't say they were crooks or defrauding people or despicable businessmen. In fact I have previously posted that I love their slabs and far prefer them to the competition. I voiced an opinion. Wasn't calling their integrity into question.

I think you still need to put your full name in the post. According to the rule listed at the top of the page: " If you give an opinion of a person or company your full name needs to be in your post."

[Snapolit1]

I didn't give an opinion on a person or a company. I gave an opinion on a website.

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

I didn't give an opinion on a person or a company. I gave an opinion on a website.

+1. It's like saying broken slabs stink, and I hate when I get them in the mail.

Now, if he said, PSA does a real shitty job at packing and they keep sending me broken slabs,.......

That might need a name. I say so much, I just put my name out there just in case!

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

I didn't give an opinion on a person or a company. I gave an opinion on a website.

Im pretty sure saying their website sucks qualifies as an opinion of a company for net54 purposes, even though I completely agree with the assessment. I have been on the site and could not find a way to verify a cert #. SGC did verify it when I called though.