![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: What do you believe PSA would grade this card? | |||
1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 2.70% |
2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 16.22% |
4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
53 | 71.62% |
5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 9.46% |
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guys,
Just wondering if you can chime in with your expert opinion of what you feel my card would grade if I sent it in to PSA. Thank You |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My guess is PSA 4.5 (OC).
Craig from Texas |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA will never give a .5 grade and a qualifier on the same card.
__________________
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Craig is damn close though. I think 4 oc
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I still think it's a straight 4. I've never seen a card graded PSA 4 OC, and a quick Google/ebay search shows none. The centering allowance on a 4 is such that an offcenter 4 usually gets all MC instead of an OC, or I suppose it may drop to a straight 3.
Or maybe I'm wrong. Has anyone ever seen a 4OC?
__________________
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Per PSA :
Cards that exhibit high-end qualities within each particular grade, between PSA Good 2 and PSA Mint 9, may achieve a half-point increase. While PSA graders will evaluate all of the attributes possessed by a card in order to determine if the card may be eligible, there will be a clear focus on centering. Generally speaking, a card must exhibit centering that is 5-10% better, at minimum, than the lowest % allowed within a particular grade. It is important to note that there may be cases where the overall strength of the card, such as the quality of the corners and print, will give the card the edge it needs despite the fact that it may exhibit only marginal centering for the grade. This is especially true for cards that find themselves within the bottom half of the PSA 1-10 scale. Finally, keep in mind that qualifiers will not apply to grades that achieve the half-point increase since, by definition, these cards have to exhibit high-end qualities within the grade in order to warrant consideration. For example, there will not be cards graded PSA NM-MT-Plus 8.5 OC or PSA EX-MT-Plus 6.5 PD since the half-point is reserved for high-end cards within each grade.
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 212/520 : 40.6% |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Boom
![]() Nice card! It's really a beautiful "4."
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1956 Topps Hank Aaron SGC 55 | cracker_jack | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-11-2015 05:54 PM |
FS: 1956 Topps Hank Aaron PSA 6 | wilkiebaby11 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 04-16-2014 05:51 AM |
WTB 1956 Clemente WB PSA and Hank Aaron | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-15-2011 04:41 PM |
1956 Topps Hank Aaron SGC 80 EX/NM | vintagetoppsguy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2010 11:19 AM |
1956 Hank Aaron Topps Card. | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-01-2005 04:58 PM |