1968, 1969 & 1970 Topps Nolan Ryan -Sent to PSA - Post 26 PSA grades back*

[murphy8276]

1969 & 1970 Topps Nolan Ryan - Should I send to PSA? What to expect?

Pretty much just like the title states. I have two Nolan Ryan cards that I think are in really decent shape that I am considering grading. I have had each for roughly ten years. I apologize in advance for the pictures since I do not have a scanner at this time suitable.

I typically do not get my cards graded and don't buy graded, but it has come the time to sell some of my collection.

Any thoughts on potential grades, value, etc are welcome.

Thanks for the input.








.

[swarmee]

I'm guessing a 6-6.5 on the '69, and a 7-8 on the '70. The bottom right corner of the '69 is dinged down to maybe a 7, and there is additional edge wear. The '70 looks clean overall, but is OC t/b. Might get a straight 8.

[turtleguy64]

almost guarantee an OC ed grade on that '70 from PSA.yes,between a 6 and 7 on the '69.They will screw you and give you a 6 on that '69.Trust me.

[KCRfan1]

I believe you are looking at a 5 on the '69, and a 6 on the '70. What grade do you think you should get for the cards?

[nolemmings]

I believe those corners keep the '69 Ryan at no higher than 5. The '70 is a 6 or 6 (OC) IMO.

[con40]

The '69 looks nice, but between the corners and the surface scratch to the right of his leg, this card is likely a 5, possibly a 6. No premium over a raw card.

The '70 is a bit nicer and might grade a 7. If it does you'll get a decent premium over a raw card, but not enough to get a you a steak dinner.

[murphy8276]

Honestly it took forever for me to join PSA and actually send these in. I feel like I got whamboozeled and have the air taken out of me on whether or not to even submit anything else to PSA again. I honestly feel like my entire submission was low (although I believe everyone would say that first time).

What does everyone think on reviewing these ones?

68 - PSA 5 (wish I could have pulled a 6, should resubmit just to try)
69 - PSA 4 (insane? or something we didn't see besides corners?)
70 - PSA 6 (fair enough grade but many here thought chances at 7 or 8, resubmit?)


Am I also nuts for considering cracking out these new cards and selling RAW due to the presentation being far from the grade? I realize people judge the card not the holder, but in this case I feel all 3 are not in the correct holders.

Thanks for input again guys.

Originally Posted by murphy8276

1969 & 1970 Topps Nolan Ryan - Should I send to PSA? What to expect?

Pretty much just like the title states. I have two Nolan Ryan cards that I think are in really decent shape that I am considering grading. I have had each for roughly ten years. I apologize in advance for the pictures since I do not have a scanner at this time suitable.

I typically do not get my cards graded and don't buy graded, but it has come the time to sell some of my collection.

Any thoughts on potential grades, value, etc are welcome.

Thanks for the input.








.

Originally Posted by murphy8276

I've add the 1968 Nolan Ryan below. I do not think it is the Milton Bradley, but I am not sure of the tell tale signs other than the left side line.

[con40]

Overall, these are fair grades.

The '68 has a crimp or dent along the top edge (visible on the back of the card) and a fully dinged corner with a fold... 5 all day long.

The '70 has centering issues, a crimp or dent on the left side of the card, and some corner touches... fair at a 6, could have been a 6.5.

Not sure why the '69 is a 4. There must be a tiny bit of paper loss on it somewhere that isn't showing in your scans. That's generally too harsh a grade for a surface wrinkle.

[murphy8276]

Originally Posted by con40

Overall, these are fair grades.

The '68 has a crimp or dent along the top edge (visible on the back of the card) and a fully dinged corner with a fold... 5 all day long.

The '70 has centering issues, a crimp or dent on the left side of the card, and some corner touches... fair at a 6, could have been a 6.5.

Not sure why the '69 is a 4. There must be a tiny bit of paper loss on it somewhere that isn't showing in your scans. That's generally too harsh a grade for a surface wrinkle.

Thank you for taking a 2nd look. You were fairly similar the first time you looked although you had said the 70 had a shot at a 7 if I recall. I am tempted to send it back in, but I suppose if it will not improve value substantially it may not be worth it. I have about a dozen or so I didn't "agree" with in my submission so I have considered sending some in for review and seeing if any at all were mis-graded so I want to be selective in that and your thoughts help.

Anyone else care to chime in please feel free.

[begsu1013]

ryan fan here and the grades do seem appropriate.

biggest factor overlooked by new submitters is the surface of the card, which we can't pick up on in scans. the gloss, scratches and even a minute surface wrinkle can take a 9 or 10 to an auto 5.

i did it starting off as well. i think a lot of us have.

but the first sub always hurts.

i would not resub these as the potential payoff does not seem worth the reward.

[DBesse27]

Grades are fair. 69 has some janky corners.