 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-26-2015, 10:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Is This Considered An "Error"?
This Sweet Cap is missing some of the red ink on the 3 on 350 subjects. Is this considered an error or misprint, and would it carry any premium?
|
|
#2
04-26-2015, 10:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I believe that is paper loss?
|
|
#3
04-26-2015, 10:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Its definitely not paper loss as I've looked at it closely with a loop. Also, it is graded PSA 5. Here is a front scan.
|
|
#4
04-26-2015, 11:56 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
To answer your question... No!
Not Yet Anyway 
__________________
Life's Grand, Denny Walsh Last edited by irishdenny; 04-26-2015 at 01:38 PM.
|
|
#6
04-26-2015, 01:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Defect. Or it rubbed off over the hundred years since it was printed. Doesn't increase the value.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM |
| We all hate "What is it worth?" but...what is highest T206 reverse error card has gone for | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-02-2008 01:31 PM |
| 1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?" | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 09-25-2007 07:06 AM |
| What is considered to be "Lefty" Groves rookie card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-20-2007 05:19 AM |
| What is considered "high grade"? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-11-2007 11:44 AM |
Hybrid Mode
