![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A lady called my store about a lot of early 1900s cards that her grandfather owned before he passed away, and I am looking for some answers as to their authenticity, if they're fakes, etc.
She sent me pictures via text and email, and there's about 75 or so Goudeys, about 80-100 T200s and some others. In all, it's about 200 cards total from the early 1900s (pre-war). I'm scheduled to meet with her later this week to see them in person, hold and feel them and just get an idea of what we're dealing with. Just wanted thoughts as to what people thought about them being real or fake. Thanks. Last edited by sfacujackcat; 10-07-2014 at 08:10 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Fake
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bad
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
See my post on the post-war side...these are all fake. Please make sure to out the seller so that others are not deceived! I will venture to guess that this is a craigslist scammer.
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the posts guys. But give me some reasons. I'd like to tell her that they're fake. No, they're not a craiglist find. It's a lady that called my store today. I'd like to explain to her what the deal is and why I think they're fake.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wrong paper, wrong ink. Corners have all been uniformly rounded. Plus it's pretty unlikely she would randomly have 5 of the biggest cards in the hobby. Occam's razor.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As others have said, they are all fake. For the Ruth Red Sox card (the first one you have), take a look at this page to see why it's a fake: Link.
For the other cards, the Playball looks took white, the Joe Jax Cracker Jack card stock looks too thick, for the Goudey Ruth, the colors look wrong on the front (e.g., you should see different levels of shading). Typically, if you have one fake, then all the others are very suspect. If someone found some undiscovered cards that they had for many years, and they are all top rated HOFers worth a lot of money, and there are no commons, then you have to be very careful as typically people should have genuine commons also. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's funny that these scammers never have any commons. Only Babe, Cobb, etc.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1930 Goudey- Babe Ruth- questionable authenticity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 99 | 01-11-2021 06:17 PM |
Shoeless Joe vs. Babe Ruth (kinda sorta) | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 02-12-2014 07:40 PM |
Ruth, Gehrig and Shoeless Joe | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-16-2013 08:04 PM |
Interesting interviews regarding authenticity of the 4.4 mil Babe Ruth jersey | travrosty | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 43 | 05-24-2012 11:14 AM |
1932 Babe Ruth Sanella Authenticity? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 02-01-2009 05:23 PM |