![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I finally bit the bullet and pulled down my first Lou Gehrig card ever. I am really excited about this new edition to my nearly complete 33 Goudey set. But, what I am not really excited about -- particularly as a T206 collector who has no patience or interest in the myriad backs that set has to offer -- is now having to pursue card #92, which sports the same front as my #160.
![]() This seems like really lazy printing, if you ask me. Giving Gehrig the same short shrift that Rube Walberg got at cards #145 and #183. Heck, even Ruth got a red and yellow background, to go along with two completely different poses. So, why dupe the Iron Horse like that? Oh, why didn't they have a little foresight and put that amazing 1934 Goudey head shot in the 33 set? C'Mon, Goudey... get with the program... ![]() ![]()
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice #160 Gehrig. I am still looking for one.
It is hard to make sense of many things in the Goudey set looking at it as collectors 80 years later. We need to look at the choices that were made in the context of that time long ago when baseball cards were neither important or valued other than as an insert for a product. Another expensive pair. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Check out my website www.imageevent.com/rgold |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Killer Foxxes! I had forgotten that those were dupes, too. Are there any others I missed?
Mine aren't even close to the same stratosphere... ![]() ![]()
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe those are the only two besides Walberg. Notice the different shade of yellow background on each Foxx. Also, the black outline on his body in the #154 does not appear on #29. Of course the paper stock differs on all low series Goudeys.
__________________
Check out my website www.imageevent.com/rgold |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hate the 2 Gehrig thing in this set. If there are any subtle differences, they are too small for me. To me, they look the same. As a Yankee collector, i try to get all the old Yankee team sets, and i have what i personally consider is the 1933 Yankee team set which is all the Yankee cards but only ONE of the Gehrig cards. Being virtually identical, i see zero reason to pay such big bucks for two of them. Cant believe on a major player like Gehrig they couldnt have at least changed the background color.
![]()
__________________
Its so great to love all the New York teams in all sports, particularly the YANKEES. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1 ...that would seem like an extremely easy fix to this otherwise obvious issue. C'Mon Goudey... Fix it!
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Ended | jcc6252 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 10-07-2014 10:20 AM |
wtb to complete sets 1933 goudey 36 diamond stars, 35 goudey, 36 goudey, 41 goudey | asw37 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 12 | 10-04-2013 04:50 PM |
HANK GREENBERG ENDS TONIGHT 2/15 - 1938 Goudey Heads Up-1936 Goudey-1941 Double Play | Tim Zwick | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 02-15-2012 12:12 PM |
Trading a Henry Johnson signed 1933 goudey for almost any other signed 1933 goudey | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-28-2009 06:10 PM |
WTB: 1933 PX3 Double Header Pins/Discs | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 11-06-2007 09:44 AM |