Thanks to Sean Skeffington - UPDATE - Suggested T205 Power Ratings for SGC

[Matt E.]

SGC,

Please click the link below and then click on the spreadsheet to open the PDF file.

http://www.imageevent.com/babybingbaseball

Honestly some of your power rating just don't make sense. If your going to overhaul the web page kindly consider revamping the T205's with correct and up to date ratings.

There are many that are off or way off. Examples: W. A Latham, Wallace One Line, you have some commons tougher than short prints etc...
Some ratings should go up and others decrease.

OTHER T205 COLLECTORS PLEASE COMMENT

Thanks,

Matt E.

[Wite3]

Matt,

Looked through your list quickly and I agree...they botched it badly...I agree with nearly everything you said on your power rankings except one...Walsh is far tougher than people think...I would keep that a 4. Everything else looks good at a glance.

Joshua

[Matt E.]

Thank you Joshua.

Noted. I'll make the change.

Thanks,

Matt E.

[nebboy]

Love the list changes spot on.

My closest thing to a change would be -
Irvin K. Wilhelm (Suffe ed In Bio) would be a 4.
Fill its in line with the other 4s in set

[Tcards-Please]

Matt,

I completely agree with your post. I'm not sure how they come to those ratings, but they definitely need to readress those ratings.

Your list of proposed Power Ratings are right on. I do agree with Joshua and John about the Walsh and Wilhelm. I tried to get SGC to change the Hoblitzell and Wilhelm for years with no such luck.

Hopefully SGC will listen to the more knowledgable collectors on the subject and correct the Power Ratings especially if enough of us bring it up.

r/
Frank

[obcmac]

I also think Matt's list is a great improvement.

For the sake of discussion, I would offer the following changes for discussion:
Joss: think it should be a 6
Gray with stats: think it should be a 6
Wallace no cap (2 lines): should be a 5 (like the other HOF pose variations Bres and collins)
Wilhelm...no problem with the "suffered" being moved to 10, for the "suffe ed" verision, I'd say at least a 5...might be a result of hoarding, but I think I've seen 5 of each of the other SP's for each Wilhelm I've come across.

Agree with the other comments on Walsh being a 4.

Mac

[AddieJoss]

I think the Evers is tougher than an average HOF and should be higher than a 3.
Ed Walsh is also tough and should be a 4.
And gray with stats should be higher as it is very tough.

Nice list though.