![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am curious to see what flaws you can live with in order to get the cards you need (especially the high end cards). Personally, I stay away from cards with paper loss, tears, pin holes, or writing. I can live with a crease or two as long as it doesn't detract too much from the look of the card. Also, rounded corners don't really bother me.
Anxious to read your responses.
__________________
Happy Collecting Ed |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am okay with tears, creases, stains, writing, trimming, and paper loss. The reason I started collecting is because of my mom's stories from her childhood. I like the cards I could picture her owning.
The only thing I won't get is a card with damage to the player's face. I feel like its a bit disrespectful to the player to mess with his face, so I just am not interested in having these.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) Last edited by Bestdj777; 11-23-2013 at 06:18 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My number one thing to avoid is intentional damage, writing, trimming, etc. but certain cards I will get in any condition due to rarity or higher grades being way to expensive.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I stay away from intentional damage, a light crease I can live with. I am ok with an o/c card if the eye appeal is nice. My pet peave is sharp corners on newer issues ( 52 Topps to more recent ). Rounded corners on those cards I never consider.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I tend to avoid cards that are severely off-centered or have bad creasing that runs through the face of the player. For some special cards, though, I could live with such flaws (eg. a 51 Bowman Mantle). Writing on the back wouldn't bother me at all, and rounded corners add character.
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Writing is a no-no...as is paper loss. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As a new owner of a 53 Bowman Mantle with paper loss on the back, there are not many flaws that would discourage me.
The worst flaw to me, is the hole punch.
__________________
Tiger collector Need: Harry Heilmann auto Monster Number 520/520 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1948-leaf-collecting printing flaws | mightyq | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 02-05-2010 01:53 PM |
What is accepted and acceptable? Results. Thanks to all who replied. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 08-25-2008 07:34 AM |
What flaws do you spot on this Ruth? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 86 | 04-23-2008 07:58 PM |
1941 Playball - Variation - Flaws - Fakes or ??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-04-2006 11:03 PM |
Strip cards - acceptable cuts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-29-2001 12:38 PM |