![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Admittedly I don't know a lot about PSA or SGC holders, I almost exclusively use BVG. However I do know enough to be pretty sure these holders have been tampered with. But to be sure I'd like some input from some of you guys. Thanks in advance for the help!
__________________
Collecting Pre-1920 HOF Postcards (single subject, not team postcards) @TreyCumby Last edited by chipperhank44; 09-07-2013 at 01:25 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Next pic
__________________
Collecting Pre-1920 HOF Postcards (single subject, not team postcards) @TreyCumby |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Last one
__________________
Collecting Pre-1920 HOF Postcards (single subject, not team postcards) @TreyCumby |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The frosting along the edges of the Mantle and JRobby would absolutely be a concern for me. Not sure if it would be worth anyone's time to tamper with an EX+ 68 Seaver though.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've received slabs from SGC directly like the Seaver.
__________________
Tiger collector Need: E121 Veach arms folded Monster Number 520/520 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Trey,
It's a little hard for me to tell from the pictures. Is what I'm seeing all the way across the top of the Robinson and Mantle frosting, or is it partial reflection? An unfortunate side effect of the sonic welding process is that the very process that creates the seam also creates some minor frosting. When I have questions about the slab being tampered with, I look at the cards themselves carefully with a loupe (comparing to a real card from the same set if possible, also under magnification). In your opinion, does the Robinson look like a 5? Under magnification, is the printing process looking right? With a 5 there should be some corner wear. Compare the stock to your control card. If you have a scanner, scan the Robinson at higher DPI, and the card you're comparing it to. Blown up, do they look the same? Then go back to the slab. With PSA slabs (and I'd assume SGC, too), there should be a rigidity to them. Does the slab at all bend when you grab the top by the flip, and at the bottom, or is it stiff? I can't wait for the new PSA holder to come out. A lot of these issues will be solved, as trying to pop a card will pretty much require destroying the original case. If you can shoot those pics again with a solid black background, I can look again.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The cards all look accurately graded to me. It's kind of hard to tell if the cases have been tampered with from the angle of the pictures. Scans would have been better. I think all 3 are okay. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They look good to me. Since you posed the question, why do you believe the holders have been tampered with?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New PSA Holder? | rp12367 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-24-2012 09:27 PM |
PSA Slab Tampering | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-28-2008 07:04 PM |
SGC Slabs and Tampering | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 10-04-2007 08:49 AM |
Fakes, Trim Jobs and other signs of Tampering | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-10-2005 06:59 PM |
SGC needs to do better on this holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-16-2001 01:56 PM |