 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-26-2013, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Something doesn't look right...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tchlink:top:en
Is it me, or does the flip look off? Wasn't the '33 Gehrig PSA 7 one of the cards used by that scammer in Mexico that was the topic of conversation a month or two ago?
__________________
-Shaun Currently seeking Jackie Robinson cards 
|
|
#2
07-26-2013, 06:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks like the same flip as the 1933 goudey Ruth they just sold for over $3000?..
I remember the old flips, but this has a new style plastic border, not the old style inner baggies...
|
|
#3
07-26-2013, 06:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Neither the Ruth nor the Gehrig match anything in this database:
http://forums.collectors.com/message...hreadid=846031
__________________
-Shaun Currently seeking Jackie Robinson cards
|
|
#4
07-26-2013, 06:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
__________________
-Shaun Currently seeking Jackie Robinson cards
|
|
#5
07-26-2013, 07:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Comparing the Gehrig to the flip examples on the PSA forum, it's closest to type 3. Notice the zeros no longer have the line through them, so it's not type 1 or 2. It can't be type 4, because the bar code is not left justified. It is indented.
Compare them side by side:  The only thing that jumps out to me is the difference in the spacing. Comparing shared numbers and letters, it appears to me the typography is identical. I'd be more concerned by the seller's no return policy, and low feedback record. I wouldn't plop down a few thousand bucks to buy either of those cards from a non-reputable seller.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. Last edited by the 'stache; 07-26-2013 at 07:14 PM.
|
|
#6
07-26-2013, 07:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Shouldn't the hologram on the back reflect?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.  My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/
|
|
#7
07-26-2013, 08:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, it should, but it looks like they have a sticker of some kind over it. There is sticker residue on the back of the flip.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd.
|
|
#8
07-27-2013, 05:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I say these are the California fakes.... Seller only has sold 3 DVDs , the all of a sudden two 33 goudeys which happen to be the 2 most faked cards in holders.... Flips look home made
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| It Doesn't Get Any Better | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 06-14-2013 07:04 PM |
| Why doesn't SGC have...... | Vegas-guy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 03-06-2012 01:28 PM |
| Is there anybody who doesn't like '71 BB? | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 26 | 09-14-2011 11:15 PM |
| Your hobby doesn't do anything. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-17-2006 02:10 PM |
| Wow! It doesn't get any better than this. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-22-2006 07:16 AM |
Hybrid Mode
