![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sorry, but I had to
![]() Autographs 101 - 'Signing Your Name' Bottom is a 1923 Urban Shocker signature. Top is a 1927. Imagine, if you can, what it would feel like to write the 'b' on the bottom ball. Then imagine the same for the top ball. Someone had a brain fart.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 11-30-2014 at 12:28 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't get it.
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think he is pointing out ow awful the b is on the top signature.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the top "B" just looks really difficult to write. Unnatural.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You're turning into a one-trick pony, Scott.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If that were true, I guess your predictable rebuttals would make you my faithful sidekick.
Instead of taking little nips at my posts, why don't you say something of substance? Explain how the same person could have written both of the 'b's shown above. And "it looks real to me" isn't useful. All decent forgeries look real.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Notice how the upstroke on the 'b' is straight, while the downstroke is bowed backwards. The upstroke and the back of the bowl of the 'b' look like one line when in true cursive the upstroke would be bowed forward and the downstroke would be a straight line down to the bottom of the bowl and crossing the upstroke. Appears that they got confused and did not know how to do a cursive b.
Last edited by Michael B; 03-05-2013 at 05:03 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
(Thanks Michael)
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting. What's the provenance of the second auto?
__________________
My Hall of Fame autograph collection http://s236.photobucket.com/albums/f...NFT/?start=all |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I picked the second one solely because it came from a ball that was sold in the same auction as the green ball. Whether it's also a fake or not, it at least illustrates how a normal human being (and Urban Shocker) writes a 'b'. If you need another for comparison, here's the one from David's ball - same normal 'b'.
But as David points out, analyzing each letter isn't the way to do this. We've already talked about the problems with the ball as a whole, so rather than beat a dead horse, I'm now simply beating at it's individual parts.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 11-30-2014 at 12:28 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Urban Shocker question | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-26-2011 10:48 AM |
FS: E220 Urban Shocker St. Louis PSA SOLD :) | jabiloxi | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 08-18-2009 02:56 PM |
1925 W504 Shocker and Wheat | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-15-2007 08:29 PM |
E220 Heilman and W504s Shocker and Wheat | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-14-2007 06:39 AM |
1922 E120s Milan, Rice, Robertson and Shocker | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-06-2007 07:04 PM |