![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All,
I am gauging interest in the below depicted T206 Oakes “White Team Letters” card. This particular card has never been offered to the hobby advertised as such. The white team letters are a byproduct of the red ink layer having been completely missed. The card is what I would call a “freak cubed.” First, instead of the bold red “CINCINNATI” that we all are accustomed to seeing on Oakes’ jersey, this card has SNOWY WHITE team letters. There is no residual pink tint that is sometimes seen on missing red ink specimens. Second, this card has a near mint appearance (having been downgraded to PSA 4 due to back staining) which distinguishes it from the typically lower grade missing red ink examples that appear at auction every once in a while. Third, Oakes is a T206 subject that hardly ever seen missing red ink. I have juxtaposed the “White Team Letters” Oakes with the common “Red Team Letters” Oakes for comparison. Feel free to PM any serious offers. Thanks. Scot Last edited by sreader3; 01-20-2013 at 09:04 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice card Scot!
Jantz |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow! I double that jantz...that's a real beauty! Sharp corners to boot!
Good luck on the sale!
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was one of the underbidders on that one. I would have went higher...but I didn't like the staining on the back...as some solvents/adhesives make colors disappear. I thought it looked pretty neat though...congrats.
Mac |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jantz, Mike--Thanks for the comments.
Mac--If you are somehow suggesting that solvents are responsible for the missing red ink on this card you are wrong. The back staining appears to be nothing more than the result of the card having been mounted and carefully removed from an album at some point, which also explains why the corners are so nice. (edited to say: Mac--Let me revise and extend my remarks and say that I am merely skeptical of your take on this card. I am not a PhD chemist. If a known adhesive applied to the back of a card can through chemical reaction remove all of the red ink from the front of the card without otherwise disturbing the front of the card in any way, shape or form then perhaps that is what happened here. But if that is the case I wonder why we haven't seen T206 doctors churning out missing red ink cards by the dozens.) Last edited by sreader3; 01-21-2013 at 02:23 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You could fix that so easily with some red water color. Wonder if anyone every touched up T206's that way?
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Abe Stark ("Hit Sign, Win Suit") letters | Gary Dunaier | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 06-02-2011 06:44 PM |
T206 Marquard "White Lines" | sreader3 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 02-03-2011 10:49 PM |
T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
1909-11 T206 “White Border” Partial Set of (154) "SOLD" | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 12 | 08-12-2008 07:11 AM |
T206 "Low Grade" Team Lot Sale... | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-07-2007 10:48 AM |