![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Question for the board...
I have an 8*10 glossy photograph that was signed in Gold paint marker. The photo is quite rare, so when one came up for sale, I jumped on it. Problem is, it was personalized... And not to me! Taking a risk, I decided to try to remove th personalization with acetone. It worked wonderfully, taking t all off without any damage to the photo. However, the original personalization left a bit "shadow effect" in places. In other words, some of the original personalization can be seen when tipping the photograph into the light - not as an imprint from depressing the marker, but as a bit of residue left over. Has anyone had luck removing this before? If so, how? Looking straight on to the photo, you would never see the residue - but if its able to be removed, I'd like too.
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Are you sure it's residue, and not that the glossy surface of the photo is etched from the paint pen?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Most def residue. Very light, but def residue. - Jon
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I haven't tried it yet, but the method & product mentioned here is said to be able to remove paint from the surface of photos without damaging them, and I imagine would therefore work for paint "residue" as well:
http://www.net54baseball.com/showpos...3&postcount=17 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thx! I'll pick some up and let you know how it works.
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did you use lab grade anhydrous acetone or acetone from home depot?
even 1-3% water in the acetone means there is water and it could damage the photo and leave unnecessary blotches. Anhydrous is "lab" grade at ".5%" it's technically zero but it's so small they have to label it as having "some" Last edited by Sean1125; 11-06-2012 at 06:13 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Stopped up an purchased the product, the cloths and gloves today from Adorama. Unfortunately the product worked about the same as acetone. So, didn't harm the photo at all, but didn't remove the residue. I brought the photo with me to Adorama, and they agreed it was some sort of residue (i.e., marker staining, so to speak). I'll update the board if I figure out something that works.
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More eBay vintage baseball photo auctions | horzverti | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 07-08-2012 04:44 PM |
need help removing tape residue from a vintage ted williams photo | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 06-07-2008 07:15 PM |
SOLD - PSA/DNA - TYPE I - 1940 Venezuelan League Josh Gibson Photo | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 2 | 07-27-2007 02:35 PM |
photo help | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 07-03-2007 01:21 PM |
Need ID help, etc. with a J.H. Woods Imperial size cabinet photo | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 08-16-2003 02:56 PM |