Can you no longer leave Neg feedback on ebay as a seller?

[Blunder19]

I just had a guy never pay for a card... never communicated with me.. nothing...

I opened and closed a case to get a refund on ebay.... I went to leave neg feedback as a non paying buyer... and ebay told me I couldn't leave feedback because he never paid..???

who runs that company? did he get a highschool diploma?

[wazoo]

Yup. EBay changed the policy, only buyers can.

[jimross]

That's the reason why I stopped selling on eBay. eBay is buyers' world now. Even Paypal also protects buyers only. I have enough dealing with those bad buyers and not worth my time to sell there anymore.

eBay forgets without sellers listing stuffs and paying them fees they would have gone out of business.

[rp12367]

Originally Posted by jimross

eBay forgets without sellers listing stuffs and paying them fees they would have gone out of business.

+1

[ullmandds]

i used to own a bunch of ebay stock...but I sold it all off a year or two ago because of all of the stupid little changes they were making that affected me(a 1 celled organism) as a seller...I figured they were going to run the business into the ground.

Fast forward to present day...the value of the stock has more than doubled since I sold...so I can only assume what they are doing is increasing their profitability...which is all they care about!

They may appear dumb to us...but obviously they know what they are doing to remain profitable!

[rainier2004]

Peter, thats crazy the stock has doubled! I only buy bb cards on ebay so my perspective is very skewed. I feel that ebay is becoming obsolete for vintage bb cards and eventually most of that business will go to all the upspringing auction house...it has become scary to sell on the bay.

[markf31]

From what I have been able to gather is that the ability to leave negative feedback was being abused by many and too often became a tool of “he said – she said” where a buyer would post perhaps a truthfully negative feedback about a seller, only to have the seller, out of spite, reply with a similar negative feedback or vice versa. Users were becoming hesitant to report negatively, even if the transaction warranted negative feedback in fear of a reprisal in the form of a false negative. The feedback system was severely flawed in this respect and I don’t know how else they could have addressed the issue.

My guess is Ebay figured the Seller’s rating was more important than a buyers. As a buyer, what is one of the first things you do when looking at and thinking about bidding on an item? You look at seller’s rating, feedback and history. This happens with almost every transaction from a buyers standpoint, it certainly does for me as a buyer. Especially in regards to the autograph side of our hobby where a sellers rating and track record is extremely important. But how many sellers take the time to investigate the rating and feedback of each and every bidder to see if they have negative feedback or a previous un-paid auction win? My guess is very very few. My guess is that sellers rarely, if ever, utilize a buyers feedback during the auction to reject a bid based on feedback, rating or their history. As a result a buyer’s rating, feedback and history is much less relevant and important to Ebay than the seller’s is.

Ebay keeps track of buyers who don’t pay when you as a seller report them. I’m not sure how many “did not pay” instances a buyer is allowed but I wouldn’t think it would be many.

[ullmandds]