Why not a higher grade with a qualifier for tape on back?

Pat R · #1 05-25-2012, 02:10 PM

...

Phillies*phan · #2 05-25-2012, 02:26 PM

The qualifier "TP" would seem a little weird.

Jaybird · #3 05-25-2012, 02:47 PM

It's also got a rip where someone tried to peel the tape off on the right side. So, not just stuck on there but damage as well. Still a nice card.

Pat R · #4 05-25-2012, 03:08 PM

...

glchen · #5 05-25-2012, 03:43 PM

That's a pretty good grade for a card with actual tape on it. The cards that I sent to PSA with tape still on it came back with Authentic/Altered grades, and those that had tape residue on it came back w/ Poor (1).

CMIZ5290 · #6 05-25-2012, 03:56 PM

PAT- Totally agree that tape stains should get graded as a qualifier as long as there is no paper loss. How is it that hand written ink or pencil marks get an (mk) as a qualifer but not tape stains? Makes no sense to me....

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
WTB: T206 Tolstoi back in low grade	freakhappy	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	0	04-15-2011 10:23 PM
Low Grade 1962 Stat Back Exhibits For Sale w/Mantle	ncinin	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	1	12-13-2009 02:45 AM
WANTED: 1963 Exhibit Stat Back Musial low grade	frankhardy	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	12-11-2009 06:20 PM
WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1	marcdelpercio	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	9	08-15-2009 10:43 AM
Busting higher grade Topps Baseball sets 1966 to 1980	Archive	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	1	09-30-2008 02:37 PM