![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just bought a Cincinnatti team card on ebay. While I'm 99% sure that it's real, I'd like confirmation as it has some oddities to it.
I've been collecting T200's for a few years, and I have a dozen now. This looks just like the rest, even under the microscope, with one big difference: It goes out of focus in several spots and has a strange bottom right hand corner/right hand border. I figured the ebay picture was a curled or damaged corner/poor photo or scan, but these anomalies [the bad crease/crack going from Clark through Groh, notwithstanding] are an actual part of the card/photograph. I've never noticed such on any other card. What I'm thinking is that it was a poor factory print and without much quality control they let it go through. Can anyone tell me if that's likely the case? Thanks. Doug Last edited by dougscats; 12-21-2011 at 08:13 AM. Reason: revision |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks real to me. I'm sure you have found with T200s that it's a huge asset to able to touch it and feel the glossiness of the photo. If you've handled a number of T200s and you've seen a reprint, you know which are authentic. And yes, I've seen them with some blur in the photo image.
PS - T200 is the first pre-war set I ever completed. Last edited by kcohen; 12-21-2011 at 08:21 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Doug,
Some T200's are found with that 'out of focus' look. The crease/crack in the bottom right corner does look odd, but like you said, it might just be an issue with the quality control. Definitely real. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks okay to me
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's real. I've seen a few T200s that have been "out of focus" in different areas of the picture.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The T200 front surfaces are covered in a film of clear gelatin, and there can be cracks to the gelatin first layer which is different-looking than regular cards.
The cards are gelatin-silver photos, which means a layer of gelatin was applied to the fronts to hold the photochemicals to the paper. This is why the T200s are glossy on front but not on back. Last edited by drc; 12-21-2011 at 12:02 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1913 T200 Fatima Team Cards... SGC graded | fkw | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 02-02-2011 01:34 PM |
Calling for T200 expertise | dougscats | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-30-2010 02:13 PM |
T200 Phil A's T200 $35 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 9 | 01-13-2009 05:36 AM |
The Great T200 debate - calling all t200 set collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-10-2008 12:14 PM |
Wanted: T200 St. Louis AL & T200 Boston NL | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-01-2007 02:59 PM |