![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see the Goodwin auction has a peck and snyder CDV labeled by SGC, but the back of the card has no reference to peck and snyder. REA has a cdv which is not sold as peck and snyder but SGC has it as a CDV 1869. Can someone tell me if all Peck and Snyder CDV cards omit a peck and snyder reference on the back? If it was a trade card used to push the sporting goods store, why no reference to it? Seems odd.
Last edited by Delray Vintage; 04-14-2011 at 06:36 PM. Reason: Spelling |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very few of the Red Stocking CdVs have a Peck and Snyder reference on the reverse. While it is possible CdVs without a Peck and Snyder advertisement on the reverse were issued by Peck and Snyder, there is no solid evidence to confirm they were issued by P&S.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gary is exactly right. In fact, I would go so far as to say that they are not Peck & Snyders.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jay,
I think the population data I stated in the prior 1869 Cincinnati CdV thread is skewed. I said there were 22 graded with 17 being trade cards and 5 being CdVs. I believe in the grading world some of the trade cards are CdVs. The figure of 17 includes all P&S cards whether a trade card or a CdV. The 5 CdVs are either blank backed or may have the team line up on the reverse. Although the graded CdVs are still rarer than their trade card counterparts, the difference in population is less than I first stated. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So the designation as a Peck and Snyder in the goodwin auction is incorrect? It seems then that only the large size would be from Peck and Snyder. The CDV size would be from other stores or just a team photo not advertising anything. Thanks Gary and Old Judge.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I have always found it easiest to differentiate the cards by calling the larger Peck and Snyders "Trade Cards" and the referring to cdv's as just "cdv's." From talking with several photograph experts, they feel that the cdv's pre-date the larger trade cards. This theory is also backed up with the fact that the cdv has an "Ann St." address for Peck and Snyder while the trade cards have a "Nassau St." address which was their later location. Last edited by Baseball Rarities; 04-14-2011 at 07:08 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Peck & Snyder 1869 address - FINALLY !!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 12-02-2004 09:04 PM |
Dating the Peck & Snyder "Creighton" Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-24-2004 11:43 AM |
Peck & Snyder OFFICIAL answer!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 07-18-2004 06:00 PM |
Peck & Snyder UPDATE !! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-14-2004 02:58 PM |
1869 Peck & Snyder Observation & Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 79 | 07-11-2004 03:51 PM |