![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Top left hand corner to the top right corner is 5 1/4". The Bottom left hand corner to the bottom right corner is 5 3/8". Was this normal? How would it grade?
http://rdwyer.250free.com/B18%20Front.JPG http://rdwyer.250free.com/B18%20Back.JPG |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the funky cut is normal on the B18 - sort of like a diamond cut on a t or e card. In terms of grading, I don't know any company other than the old GAI that grades these and I'm not familiar with the grading standards for B18. My guess would be staining would play a much more significant role in the grading than the odd cut.
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you Jon. Other thoughts from anyone else? Grade?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm pretty sure these aren't graded by anyone, other than perhaps GAI. I look for full borders all the way around on these, and I think yours comes up short--measure from the middle across and see if it makes 5 1/4" each way. It also appears that there may be stitch marks in the blanket; if so, it would grade good at best, IMO. Usually you can see the stitch holes when you hold it up to a light. If no stitch marks, I'd give it a vg/vg-ex. Nice example, though--I doubt I would grade mine even if grading was available--eye appeal trumps technical grade here.
Edited to add that the uneven cut would not downgrade it much, provided the specs were right all the way around. Last edited by nolemmings; 07-11-2009 at 07:56 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Upon close inspection, I don't see any stitch marks. My guess is that the color is missing, making it look like stitching. (You can't see through, no holes or thread, etc.) The blanket measures 5 1/4 x 5 1/4 x 5 1/4 x 5 3/8. Middle measures 5 1/14 one way and the other measures 5 1/8.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is a scan of a WJ that I lost in a burglary several years ago. Note the full borders all around, although there is light pink discoloration along the home to firstbase line:
![]() To me, full borders are the best attribute, and less than 5 1/4 throughout would downgrade. As for grading, IMO fraying or severe staining would be the worst defect. These also suffer from poor registration, fading, product/other staining and centering. Last edited by nolemmings; 07-11-2009 at 09:06 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BVG will grade these.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
that's good to know, although it appears they do not list that set among the cards they grade:
http://www.beckett.com/grading/lists/bb.asp |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC Grading Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-08-2008 06:43 PM |
Question About Grading Turkey Reds | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-14-2008 11:32 AM |
Question about B18 Blankets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-14-2008 01:12 AM |
General Question about grading (opinion) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-17-2005 07:55 AM |
sgc grading question for y'all | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-16-2005 04:32 PM |