![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wonder if anyone has opinions on grading of this postcard. The reason I ask, it has a pinhole on the top. What number grade do you think it would get from SGC? The postcard has no writing on the back.
Thanks Joe Last edited by jcmtiger; 05-08-2009 at 03:00 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
because of the pinhole - an SGC 10
otherwise it looks like an SGC 40 or so (hard to tell from scan if there is creasing / wrinkles).
__________________
Joe D. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think no better than a 10.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have talked to SGC at lenght about pin holes. I have a card that is a SGC 30 with 2 pin holes that was reviewed and still held the grade. That being said I would think this would get a 30 or at worse a 20. I think the pin hole does less damage as far as the grade then if it had writing on the back.
James G |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
writing = 10
pinhole = 20 writing with a pinhole = priceless |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
a 20
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It would be very interesting to see what it would get. Is it a tack hole or a pin hole? I have seen many T5s with not much more than a tack hole and they routinely are awarded 10s (with no writing).
Last edited by HRBAKER; 05-08-2009 at 04:24 PM. |
![]() |
|
|