|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Psa question
I have never had very good luck with PSA. Lost items twice for months.
Lately having to send things back for a reholder. Need your opinion on this one. I sent in a 1981 Donruss Promo or test panel to be graded. This particular one has never been graded because PSA didn't have a holder for it. It is approximately 10 1/2 x 4 3/4. Yesterday I got my grades and they have labeled it a 1981 Donruss test panel. It should be labeled a Jumbo or large panel . Now here is my question. The panel was graded a psa 7. How do I know if this panel was graded down because they thought it should have been a different size? My other 2 graded a 9 so it is a real question. It also makes me wonder what is going on at PSA these days. I sent this in on an 8 day express and of course that didn't happen and now this. The last reholder took a month. I really feel this should be regraded, don't know how to get that done. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
They have a re-review process right? I think its like $20 and they will take another look?
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
If they thought it should be a different size, it wouldn't have gotten a grade at all.
If you think they labeled it wrong, then you can contact their customer service and if they agree with you, you can send it back and they'll reholder it free as a mechanical error.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
On something like a panel a 7 is a pretty fantastic grade. A 9 is exceptional. Hard to say without seeing it. But an item could easily be graded for a very slight corner issue, light surface scratches, print defects, etc. just because the first 2 got a 9 doesn’t mean every one will.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Psa question
ok, I HAVE RECEIVED THE PANEL BACK AND ATTACHED PHOTOS.
I HAVE NO IDEA HOW THEY GRADED THIS. THE CERTIFICATE NO. IS FOR A REGULAR PANEL NOT A JUMBO. IF YOU LOOK AT THE POPULATION REPORT THEY SHOW A JUMBO SINGLE CARD. THE REGULAR PANEL AND THE MINI PANEL. AS I MENTIONED, THEY HAVE NEVER GRADED A JUMBO BEFORE. THE LAST ORDER I SENT IN HAD THREE PANELS ALIKE AND ONE HAD TO BE SENT BACK FOR A REHOLDER. THIS IS TOTALLY NOT RIGHT AND LEAVES ME NOT CONFIDENCE IN THE GRADING. SORRY. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Are you saying Jumbo because the individual cards are larger than 3.5"x2.5"? I'm trying to figure out your point, because you are not being clear.
A panel is a panel. And they graded it for you. But you aren't really making any sense, and it's coming off as sour grapes. Maybe press your Caps Lock button once, take a deep breath, and attempt to explain why you're unhappy.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah very cool piece
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hobby question bowman and topps question 1950 to 1953 | Bigdah | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 12-20-2016 06:55 PM |
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |