NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

View Poll Results: What was the worst Topps produced set of of the three previous votes?
1958 14 13.86%
1968 26 25.74%
1979 61 60.40%
Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:01 PM
almostdone's Avatar
almostdone almostdone is offline
Drew Ekb@ck
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NE Georgia
Posts: 1,425
Default Final Poll!! Vote of the all time worst Topps produced set

Well the final tallies are all in on three different decades of the worst produced Topps set. The 1950's was a clear cut winner with 1958 being voted the worst.

The 69's was even a bigger landslide with 1968 coming in first (or last depending on your point of view).

Finally the 1970's was a much closer race and it came down to the wire with 1979 squeaking it out over 1978.

So now we come to the final vote. Out of these three sets which was the all time (at least 1952 through 1979) worst set produced by Topps?

Remember to include comments, card scans to prove your case, even a bit of thrash talk if needed.

I'll leave this one open a full week to get as much talk and protests in as needed.

Drew
__________________
Drew

Last edited by almostdone; 07-20-2015 at 07:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:11 PM
Vintagevault13's Avatar
Vintagevault13 Vintagevault13 is offline
€d M!££w00D
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 522
Default

Tough call for me to choose between the 1968 and 1979 sets. I have decided to cast my vote for 1979. I collected in the 70's and remember how excited we were to open the first pack every spring to see the new design. I vividly recall being very disappointed from the first moment I saw the 1979's. The design was basically a rehash of 1976. There were some decent action shots, but nothing really new that we hadn't already seen in the 74-78 sets.
__________________
Happy Collecting

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:19 PM
mrmopar mrmopar is offline
Curt
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,576
Default

Each set has some cool features (like the AS subsets of both 58 and 68). I guess 79 is fairly bland in general. There are some standout cards like the Rose too, so I have to go with 68 overall here.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:23 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cardboard Land
Posts: 7,483
Default

The '58 set is an absolute abomination. Love the All Star cards, but that's it. What were the fine folks at Topps thinking????
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:29 PM
7nohitter's Avatar
7nohitter 7nohitter is offline
Member
And.rew Mil.ler
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 1,526
Default

I actually love the '68 set. '79 has my vote.
__________________
Working on the 1957 Topps set.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:18 PM
egri's Avatar
egri egri is offline
Sco.tt Mar.cus
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,793
Default

I went with 1979. The 1958 design was a bit bland, but at least it had Stan Musial's first Topps card going for it, and I feel like that design was somewhat reflective of the trends of the time, whilst the 1979 design could really be plopped down in any decade.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-22-2015, 12:45 PM
Exhibitman's Avatar
Exhibitman Exhibitman is online now
Ad@m W@r$h@w
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank
Posts: 13,208
Default

1968, Reused a ton of photos, ugly-ass burlap bag designs, many capless mug shots, no action images, just a zero inspiration set. About the only good thing was the All Star subset but those stupid puzzle backs wrecked that.

1968 edged out 1979 for me only because 1979 has some nice looking action cards in it., e.g., Rose, Morgan, Garvey, Guidry, Rice, Stargell, etc.



I like the 1958 design way more than 1968 or 1979. Team logos always are a bonus for me. Wasn't well executed but there are some decent cards in there, like Spahn, Ashburn, etc.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true.

https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/

Or not...

Last edited by Exhibitman; 07-22-2015 at 12:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-22-2015, 01:42 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,000
Default Just For Adam




Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-22-2015, 03:15 PM
bosoxfan bosoxfan is offline
rich
member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: north jersey
Posts: 98
Default

When you put the backs of the 1968 topps all star cards together you had a picture of Yaz. Now, it really doesn't get any better than that.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-22-2015, 03:27 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,000
Default Yaz or Torre

Except for Torre, just after the 67 World Series.

Yes I know, 2004 and 2013 . I was on a cruise from Montreal to Miami and docked in Boston the morning after the Sox clinched in 2013. Bad timing for a Cardinals guy. But I liked our visit there

Last edited by ALR-bishop; 07-22-2015 at 03:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vote! Worst Topps produced set of the 50's almostdone Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 60 12-27-2015 07:03 PM
Vote!! The worst Topps produced set of the 1970's almostdone Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 17 07-23-2015 10:07 PM
Vote!! Worst Topps produced set of the 1960's almostdone Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 40 07-13-2015 03:52 PM
My vote for worst slab design Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 9 12-20-2005 10:39 PM
Vote for Worst Condition Card on EBAY Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 25 04-15-2004 10:54 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 PM.


ebay GSB