![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ETA: I submitted a customer service request via email outlining the below details (without the greedy part) and received a call from SGC agreeing the $250 fee was not appropriate for this card in this condition and apologizing for the hard-line attitude I received from their employee. We came to an agreement on the encapsulation fee.
These greedy fukks. I hate grading anyway and I only do it for cards I’m getting rid of to pay for new acquisitions. I send this heavily cropped Goudey Ruth for slabbing at a $1500 declared value (a little light on the value maybe, but not by much, I paid $1500 for it) for the $15 grading fee. Realistically I can maybe get $2k-ish for it. This employee, Matt, gives me a call (I’ve never received a call from SGC before except when some of my cards went missing from their post office) and tells me the minimum GRADING FEE for this Goudey Ruth is $250…so greater than a $3500 valuation. I tell them there is absolutely no way it’s worth that but I would be agreeable to pay an $85 grading fee for a $1500-$3500 valuation. Him and someone else go to “check comps” and he comes back and says a recent PSA 1 was $3700 so I have to pay the $250…and I literally LOL. I have to assume this type of aggressive money grabbing tactic is a result of Collector’s purchase of SGC. It's so out of character for the SGC I’ve dealt with in the past, albeit infrequently. Serves me right for hating grading but grading anyway. My bad, but thought it would look really nice for someone in the black SGC slab (really nice might be an exaggeration, but pretty good). Here’s the beauty in question…rant over, lol. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. Last edited by CardPadre; 03-26-2024 at 04:28 PM. Reason: Update |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To be fair, I don't think they are that far off on their evaluation. But I do think the $85 you suggested would have been fair.
This sold recently for $3,150. ![]() https://www.ebay.com/itm/PSA-AUTHENT....m43663.l10137 Last edited by markf31; 03-26-2024 at 01:53 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My point was pretty evident. Their evaluation is NOT that far off given comparable recent sales of Authentic/Altered sales. Only a single Authentic/Altered graded PSA has sold for under $3,500 in Ebay's recent history. You can complain about your border all you want, but their use of recent sales supports their evaluation.
Last edited by markf31; 03-26-2024 at 02:26 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That’s not even true. I’ve found 2 here and these cards are significantly different/better than what I submitted. And eBay isn’t everything in comps, could find more similar comps elsewhere if I had to. ![]()
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dude, take a deep breath. You asked for input and Mark is giving you some points to consider. Why are you lashing out at him???
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is a big difference in eye appeal between the two. The fact that a superior looking trimmed example with more of the borders intact sold for just over the pricing threshold (the huge pricing differences at grading card companies for the different levels of perceived value are just plain nonsensical) should not make this still neat card be considered also at this higher level.
brianp(arker)-beme |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ugh...well Nat did write a big check and the upcharge at PSA is a HUGE revenue boost for them. I think $85 was the right fee to have paid. More of this to come...soon we will not be able to reach anyone there and will have to wait 4 weeks for a reply to an email. Maybe Nat will force them to answer calls and dedicate 3 people to the phones so it will take 4 days of successive attempts to get into the queue.
The only thing that is good about this...and I am reaching...is that it suggests that Nat might actually be planning on keeping the brand alive.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
try cgc
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, that's a possibility. Won't present quite as nice in their slabs, but maybe if I have a broader submission to send and can include it...which I don't likely have in the near future. Not gonna send as just 1 card most likely.
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. Last edited by CardPadre; 03-26-2024 at 02:02 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What is funny about this post is that you tried to submit a Goudey Ruth at a $15 charge rather than the $85 charge thus drawing attention to yourself.
So seems like you were the one that was trying to pull the fast one hoping to get away with them not catching. Doesn't matter what you paid in it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by ezez420; 03-27-2024 at 03:19 AM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But to the point of them wanting to charge more money to grade a particular card like that ...
with their thinking of - " this card is expensive and will take many hours of inspection " .if somehow they graded it " A "...but later it was found to be a fake.... I dont think they are refunding you ( don't actually know ? ) , so you paid the higher fee and lost out |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Well it does matter if I bought it on a public marketplace and established a verified sold value for it that anyone had the opportunity to pay more for if they wanted. Do you submit all your really nice cards at a PSA 10 valuation? If so, how nice of you. Do you feel like a bad person when you get an upcharge, knowing how dishonest you were? They have the right to increase fees and I’m asked to provide my own estimate of fair market value. Both things successfully happened. Their initial proposed raised fee was not reasonable, my value estimate actually was. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What was the agreement? The $15 or $85? Or something else.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It was the $85 that was not offered to me in my initial upcharge phone call.
__________________
Trading! See my Flickr "For Trade" album for what I have and my "About" section for what I'm looking for. https://www.flickr.com/photos/197267578@N07/albums If you want a card, you might not get a deal. If you want a deal, you might not get a card. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think there should be an encapsulation fee and an evaluation fee. It takes almost no effort to authenticate that card and there isn't any grading involved. It's just putting it in a case.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
In this case, like most of the other posters in this thread, I agree that the $85 fee was the appropriate one in this situation. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
At least, that's what I've read from Peter in a few posts over the last ~12 months.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Mets - Same crap as the last crap | Snapolit1 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 159 | 04-03-2024 02:59 PM |
Tale of a Scammer Interaction | Rhotchkiss | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-15-2022 02:48 PM |
How much more crap can there be? | RichardSimon | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 08-20-2016 08:03 PM |
Vintage 1951 NY Giants flannel find – Player interaction and success story | Tay1038 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 04-04-2014 04:57 AM |
More crap..... | autograf | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 01-03-2010 01:54 PM |