![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Im curious as to opinions after reading about an altered PWCC-HE card posted on eBay. While PWCC is a consignment company, does slapping that PWCC certification on a card change that roll and make them liable?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Can you link whatever you read? Is the card graded Altered by PSA, but labeled HE or PQ by PWCC? That's no problem. HE and PQ are only telling you about the eye appeal of the card, not that it deserves a better grade.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I noticed PWCC listing a 1950 Bowman PSA Jackie Robinson HE/PQ card. Wanting to compare and see if it justified the money, I compared it to others on eBay. Thats where I ran across this one. Of course this stirred a conversation with some dealers and collectors. The comments ranged from "The one being listed might also be suspect if it came from the same person"..."How or why would people pay thousands more on some cards just because a company attached a sticker saying it was pretty"..."PWCC should stick to consigment because you cant say a card is in the top 5% of all cards in its grade when you cant even spot an altered card"...."One or both companies should address this"...."Its bad enough getting burned by PSA, let alone add in an additional company and the total cost of the lose"....."PWCC should add in a disclaimer stating card isnt even guaranteed to be authentic or not altered" ect. I believe the reason why PWCC is being centered out is because in some cases, the card sells for double or triple of what the actual card is worth with just the grading company. Lets say a PSA graded Reggie Jackson rookie sells for $150 but it has really nice centering and would sell for $200. Add in the HE sticker and all of a sudden it does $600. Not only would you be mad you spent $200 on an altered card but you would be really mad if spent the additional $400 on top of that. People get upset when they lose money...maybe thats why some folks pay the big bucks to PSA and PWCC to know its a safe investment and one of the best possible choices.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There have been many cards that one grading company gave a number grade to that another company said was altered. I have had it happen. I have had PSA say a card was altered and have them give it a grade the next time.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sounds like BS to me. Who would crack out a card in a psa 6.5 holder with a high end pwcc sticker to send in to bvg? And if it's true it doesn't say much for the common sense of this seller. Either way I would stay away.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I don’t even bother to question their methods anymore.
__________________
I am not tech savvy... |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R | PiratesWS1979 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 09-16-2018 08:27 PM |
Wanted: Altered Cards | T205 GB | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-13-2016 04:58 PM |
Counterfeit/altered Cards? | jg8422 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 07-17-2011 12:09 PM |
altered? - what are your thoughts? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 10-30-2007 08:36 AM |
ink/painted altered cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-28-2002 10:04 PM |