![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bobby's 1954 Kaline rookie made me think of this topic. Show a card you picked up because you just thought it was undergraded which made it a good deal. Here's a few of mine. I don't think the Ford is OC at all.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That Whitey does not need an OC qualifier. Maybe not an 8 but I've seen much worse centering without the qualifier.
Here are my two. The 53 is really baffling, looks amazing in hand and the 51 could be a 5 any day of the week and twice on Sunday if you as me. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From the scan that 54 Bowman Mantle looks like a beauty! What great color.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David,
Those are some nice undergraded cards...wow. Nice Musial...is that a "6" because it is OC? How is the back? I must be missing somethingon your $250 Williams '54 Topps. Nice cards. Z Wheat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
None of mine are under graded since they are all UN graded . I only care if I like them
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
One Post-War...
One Pre-War... And back is clean!!!
__________________
M@tt McC@arthy I collect Hal Chase, Diamond Stars (PSA 5 or better), 1951 Bowman (Raw Ex or better), 1954 Topps (PSA 7 or better), 1956 Topps (Raw Ex or better), 3x5 Hall of Fame Autographs and autographed Perez Steele Postcards. You can see my collection by going to http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BigSix. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't have a scan, but the back of the Musial is clean. I guess it simply got downgraded for centering. I wish I had a better picture of the #1 Williams so you could see how nice it really is. I think the grader was asleep that day.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That Palmer and the 54 Bowman Mick might take the cake for undergraded.
I too, have shared that bittersweet feeling of an undergraded card. Amazing at the time of purchase, but the second you own it, you want that baby to get the grade it deserves. So here are my own cards that did not get the proper love from the graders on their Judgment Day... Here's my color commentary on each... 1. Ruth: Hello, Mr. Grader. Do you have eyes? Okay, then, so you can see this is not your normal 1, and thus this is precisely what the 1.5 grade is for. I mean, facryin'outloud, it slaughters the eye appeal of most higher grades, which are usually like 80-20 and creased to hell. The back is not mauled by any means. So why the 1? I know what your technical guide says, but isn't there subjectivity in this grading game? I mean, you tell me it's subjective and that's why you charge me for reviews, but then when I review it you say you can't be subjective and have to follow the technical guidelines. I hate you. 2. Aaron: Hey, grader, how you been-- what? A 4? Oh, c'mon, guy! How many Aarons have three equally sized white borders? Where's the love? 3. Clemente: Really, grader? 6.5? So without the .5 system, this would be in its rightful 7 all day. Shame on you. You were supposed to grade the Clemente, not the hottest chick you've ever taken home. 4. 57 Mick: Oh, hello there, grader (pronounced, "NEWMAN!" a la Seinfeld). I see you still suck. Find me focus and centering like this in another 5? Trick question, you dick, because this is really a 6. 5. Ryan RC: Oh, hello again, grader. I see that apparently you still have not gotten laid. Surely had you busted that coagulated clam chowder nut last night on that mediocre land monster at the Hooters bar, you would have been fair to the sickest centered Ryan around and given it an 8.5! 6. 74 Ryan: Ah. You again. Thanks for the 8. I can see you are routinely short by one. So how about next time you buy a lotto ticket for a dollar and give the guy a ten, he gives you back eight bucks? Would you like that? Dick. 7. 75 Brett: You know, why do I bother? You just had to withhold the 10, didn't you? Withholding, just like my mother and wife. You just couldn't stand to make a guy 15k with the entry of a number, could you. So now, know what happens? I'm gonna crack this card out and slash you with its razor corners. There. Oh, thanks-- now your blood is gonna get it an ST when I resubmit. 8. 79 Molitor: Clearly I'm a masochist. Why am I here again, asking for your opinion, when I know you won't give me the 10. You're just gonna blue ball me with this 9, and keep me coming back, wining and dining you. Until I'm broke. Will I ever learn? I kind of feel the way I feel when I say, "I'm never drinking again." Last edited by MattyC; 01-23-2014 at 04:31 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The grader on that Palmer must have been drunk. Wow.
Matty, your whole collection is under graded. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS 33 Goudey Cuyler SGC 45 (3.5). UNDERGRADED LOOKS EXMT $75 OBO | brian29575 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-13-2013 06:28 PM |
Undergraded??? | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-15-2013 06:51 AM |
Undergraded? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 03-25-2010 01:10 AM |
Undergraded???....lets see 'em | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 12-01-2009 09:38 AM |
Truly undergraded or trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-15-2008 09:31 AM |