![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
We discussed this many years ago (2003-4?) when I first acquired this piece, but just wondering if anyone has additional thoughts, as I plan on putting it on ebay in my next set of auctions.
It's a copy of "A Collegiate Game of Baseball", but it's on 1/4" thick resin, and it has the same characteristics as the actual print block that would have been used to print the original woodcuts (engravings in the surface at various depths). At the time that I bought mine, there was another being auctioned by the same auction house, both in 19th century original frames and both hand-colored. It's a gorgeous piece, but I've never seen the technique - however it was done would almost certainly have required the original print block. At the time we last discussed it, one member (I can't remember who) said he had seen one sold in Europe at a souvenir shop. Not sure if he was joking. In any case, if it's a modern reproduction, I'd sure like to hear from someone who has a theory as to the process used, as I've never seen anything like it, before or since, of any subject. ![]() ![]()
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 10-21-2011 at 04:03 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is my orig. harpers of yours. Also my resin piece. Even though there copies i think there great.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Whoever colored that top piece did a great job. It has almost a 3D look to it.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My scans are actually misleading. By definition, this really is 3-D, but it's 3-D like a printer's block would be - depth so that ink is set on the paper in the appropriate amounts.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think your colored piece was created using a different process from mine. I've seen two like yours - it's a smooth resin or plastic with the description below it, right?
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My guess would be that the top image is laser etched/engraved onto a black painted panel and hand colored.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The dot patterns showing in the closeup would lead me to think that a mask of some sort was printed onto a plate that was then etched and the resin items were cast from that. There's a few other ways of doing it, but that's the easiest way to make a number of them. If the lines are very deep then it may have been done some other way.
Laser engraving wouldn't typically show the dot pattern unless you wanted it to. And the actual woodcut woudn't have it at all. Detailed woodcuts were usually done on maple endgrain. The parts cut away don't print, so the depth of cut isn't important. (It is in engraving, the process used for most US stamps well into the 1970's. ) I've tried a couple woodcuts from my carpentry scraps, the material is great to work with. Making something come out really nice is quite challenging though and whoever did the Harpers stuff was very impressive. Steve B |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very cool...really like the coloring and framing on your piece. Do you have any additional information on how it was produced and was there any additional info on the back prior to getting it framed?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no not that i remember. I njust loved the look of them. don't know who is producing them. I would also like more info.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott,
When you say 'resin', what kind of resin is it? The hard stuff, likely with bubbles like you see today, soft to the touch like 'Ivorex' (almost feels like soap), tough (tap it) but almost brittle, etc. And how heavy is it? Modern resin is discernibly heavier than earlier kinds. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
its like a hard plastic type material. Not soft.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed...certainly not soft. It definitely is heavier (compared to what I would expect it to be before I pick it up) and has texture and different depths in certain locations.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would imagine it's an acid etch process. It's a pretty simple process that would make sense in a modern short run with some hand detailing.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm very tempted to pull this out of the frame to see if there's any additional information but will likely wait until I'm at the frame shop in a few weeks for something else. Thanks. George |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All,
I went to the frame shop today and brought the Harper's resin etch (or whatever it is) with me. We removed the actual etch from the frame and below are the results. It was cut to the shape of the frame and measures ~8"x10." It has a somewhat sweet smell to it which I don't know how to explain but it was certainly there. The piece itself felt like plastic and the framer told me he recognized it as an older form of plastic called bakelite. There were no markings on the backside and it did look like it had some age to it although to my untrained eye I'm not sure how old it is. The framer said that this approach was popular in the 1930's. Now I just noticed something very interesting on the etch that would not have been obvious in the frame. On the bottom left there is some sort of signature "FER" followed by "1889" then "WP Snyder." In the original woodcut below you will see that only "WP Snyder" is visible but that could be caused by the limitations on dimension of the woodblock as applied to the paper to create the woodcut. http://www.sportsartifacts.com/memharperscollege.JPG To make things even more confusing, I noticed that in Kevin's woodcut that there is "1889" after "WP Snyder." I highly doubt that they would have printed two different variations of this woodcut but I guess it's possible. I guess I'm even more baffled now as to the process and timeframe given above information but at least wanted to share the observations from this particular piece. George |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My understanding is that if it's bakelite, it should have a "formaldehyde" smell when heated (dipped in warm water or sometimes by rubbing/friction heat from your finger). If it has a sweet smell, it is most likely resin.
Also (and someone correct me if I'm wrong), isn't bakelite usually carved rather than etched?
__________________
Ebay Store and Weekly Auctions Web Store with better selection and discounts Polite corrections for unidentified and misidentified photos appreciated. Rude corrections also appreciated, but less so. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
it's bakelite.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SOLD: 1882 Harper's Weekly - Chicago (NL) Team Woodcut w/Cap Anson & King Kelly | bcbgcbrcb | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-30-2011 02:49 PM |
1882 Harper's Woodcut [ENDS TONIGHT!] | T206Collector | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 6 | 06-15-2010 05:53 PM |
1889 Leslie's John Ward Woodcut | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-08-2007 05:29 PM |
1889 Buck Ewing Game Woodcut SOLD | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-30-2007 11:11 AM |
Harper's woodcut question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-05-2004 12:00 AM |