![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a busy day for me, and I hope you'll excuse me, but I'm excited.
I just bought a '33 Goudey Ruth, and I want to know the expert's opinion as to whether or not it's authentic, if that's possible. Despite the fuzzy scan--the bottom of it, the red part, looks real, with not a defined/straight border-line. I've always wanted this card but couldn't afford the $700-1,000 even a poor one would cost. I'll take the back damage as long as it's authentic. I figured that, as the seller claimed it was original, I could get a refund if it wasn't. Please let me know if I'm right about that. Usually I pay immediately, but I haven't paid yet; I'd like to hear from the board first. I tried to include the scan, but The ebay image does not copy and paste. If someone can tell me how to show the picture, I will. Thanks for your trouble. The item number and other text did copy, as follows: Babe Ruth 1933 GOUDEY #144 Item condition: Acceptable Ended: Jan 10, 201113:06:38 PST Bid history: 2 bids Winning bid: US $333.00 Shipping: FREE shipping Expedited ShippingSee more services See shipping discounts | See all shipping details Delivery: Estimated within 5-6 business days Returns: 7 day money back, buyer pays return shipping | Read return policy details Learn moreabout eBay Buyer Protection - opens in a new window or tab Seller info Member id chris5235 ( Feedback Score Of 145) 100% Positive feedback Other item info Item number: 190486498626 Item location: Des moines, WA, United States Original/Reprint: Original League: Major Leagues Product: Single Team: New York Yankees Era: Pre-WWII (Pre-1942) Player: Babe Ruth Year: 1933 Card Manufacturer: Goudey |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am by no means an expert and am ALWAYS skeptical of ungraded, high dollar cards on eBay. So, for this card I vote fake.
My reasons: 1) Ungraded 2) Fuzzy, long distance scan. 3) Borders have that artificial aging look to them. 4) Back is damaged where the words "REPRINT" might show up. 5) Fairly low selling price for a card with a decent looking front 6) Seller also has a 1940 Play Ball Dimaggio for sale (ungraded). 7) Seller only buys coins. If real, I don't know what this card would grade, as in, if it would get a numerical grade or just an AUTH but if a 1 normally goes for $700 - $1,000, like you say, then this card sold for less than half of the lower range and only had two bids. That tells me either people didn't see this card or had questions about it. I say this because if I had the money and were looking for a filler Ruth for my 1933 Goudey set and was prepared to spend $700 - $1,000 dollars on a low grade one and saw this card, I would jump at the chance to get a bargain. Finally, when questions like this arise about cards, I take it as a chance to test my knowledge and skills, as far as being able to tell real cards from fakes so I cant wait to hear what the experts say about this card. Good luck, David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, David, for your good observations.
I'll take this opportunity to rephrase what I said earlier: I'll pay for this item by the end of the night unless I hear compelling evidence not to. I imagine it might be impossible to tell whether it's authentic without looking at a good scan or seeing the card up close. Assuming that I do pay tonight, when I get the card, I'll post a good scan. I do see that the seller offers a 7-day refund, and that makes me feel more secure. Thanks in advance to any others for your help. Doug |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
With the scan being so bad, the only compelling evidence is the roof.
The roof is missing the top 20% which shows that the whole top edge was cropped when they designed these reprints. I knew it was a reprint right away because Ive seen so many of this type of reprint. With a clear scan you will see that the "G" and the "(B" are going to be almost touching the left border and the gap above Ruths hat will be almost completely gone (should be a gap of yellow background above the hat) The other things that jump out are the overall color of the border are way too dark for the wear (tea/coffee stained), and the back damage right where the word reprint was scuffed off, and the back ink is too dark. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do not pay for it. See post above yours, which was likely
posted at the time you were composing your 6:10pm post. edit: whoops! Nevermind... ![]() Last edited by CW; 01-10-2011 at 04:25 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buying a raw Goudey Ruth or Gehrig just based on a blurry scan is an incredibly dangerous proposition. They are some of the most reprinted cards out there and there are some compelling reprints floating around.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all your good information and advice.
I feel quite chastened and embarrassed, of course, like I should've known better. I'll be more careful next time. I've written the seller and asked him to cancel the sale. I'll let you know how it comes out. Doug |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
this. (or +1...or qft)
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=190486498626
Its a reprint. On this type of reprint you will see the "G" in "George" in top left corner, and the top of the hat are way too close to the border. Even though the scan is bad, you can tell the roof is too short compared to authentic cards. Plus the uniform is too white compared to the artificially aged borders. The back damage is right where the words "Renata Galasso Reprint" was scuffed off, between the words "GOUDEY GUM CO." and "BOSTON" Last edited by fkw; 01-10-2011 at 04:08 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whoa! That's pretty compelling, Frank, and at this point I'm beginning to feel pretty stupid. At least I had the sense to ask the board.
I'd rather feel stupid than than lose $333 or go to the trouble of trying to get a refund. I'll wait awhile to see if anyone else has anything to add. Thanks. Doug |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just a couple of things that are shameless reprints
![]() Don't buy a high dollar card from a low feedback seller. 145 is a feedback rating that can be replicated with two months of intensive reprint buying. Don't buy a high dollar card from a guy unless he's sold 5-10 similar or more valuable cards in the last 90 days. The more the better. Don't buy a high dollar card from a guy with a blurry scan. Even if it came from his grandfather's attic. Trying to shave 400 bucks of the final price to get a great deal is not something you do with a Goudey Ruth. Not trying to preach at all. These are just some the the things I've picked up this board. BTW... The best thing you did was consult this board. In the end, you came out great |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Run, as fast as you can, from that card! Yikes!
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: SGC 33/34 Goudey, Sport Kings Ruth SGC 10, Swell Sport Thrills #1 SGC 80 | JamesGallo | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-01-2009 10:36 PM |
R309-1 1934 Goudey Premium Babe Ruth | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-17-2007 02:41 AM |
*07.23.07 deep discounts* Vintage Allen & Ginter, Goudey, Double Play, Topps and Bowman | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-24-2007 01:58 PM |
33 Goudey 53 Ruth GAI 7 / PSA 7 probable fraud | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-04-2005 10:40 AM |
Goudey Ruth Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-24-2003 12:11 PM |